chore(core): replace 'sanity' imports for relative paths in core

[pedrobonamin]

Description

Adds a new rule to avoid imports from sanity in files inside packages/src/core/** and replaces all the necessary imports.
Importing from sanity in core creates issues with the tests running with vitest, mocking sanity inside a test in core generates inconsistent imports and could produce hard to follow tests errors.
example:

What to review

Is this change correct?

Testing

No new functionalities added, existing tests passing should be enough

Notes for release

n/a this is internal

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 2, 2025 2:42pm
performance-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 2, 2025 2:42pm
test-next-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 2, 2025 2:42pm
test-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 2, 2025 2:42pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Jan 2, 2025 2:42pm

[github-actions]

No changes to documentation

[github-actions]

Component Testing Report Updated Jan 2, 2025 2:52 PM (UTC)

✅ All Tests Passed -- expand for details

File	Status	Duration	Passed	Skipped	Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	1m 7s	15	0	0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	12s	3	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	38s	6	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	50s	11	7	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	0s	0	12	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	25s	6	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	14s	3	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	27s	6	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	1m 6s	15	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	1m 28s	21	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	1m 39s	18	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	13s	3	9	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	26s	6	0	0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	1m 43s	21	0	0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	0s	0	3	0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx	✅ Passed (Inspect)	0s	0	3	0

[github-actions]

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Thu, 02 Jan 2025 14:54:43 GMT

Benchmark	reference latency of sanity@latest	experiment latency of this branch	Δ (%) latency difference
article (title)	25.6 efps (39ms)	27.0 efps (37ms)	-2ms (-5.1%)	✅
article (body)	64.3 efps (16ms)	67.3 efps (15ms)	-1ms (-/-%)	✅
article (string inside object)	26.3 efps (38ms)	27.8 efps (36ms)	-2ms (-5.3%)	✅
article (string inside array)	23.3 efps (43ms)	22.7 efps (44ms)	+1ms (+2.3%)	✅
recipe (name)	52.6 efps (19ms)	62.5 efps (16ms)	-3ms (-15.8%)	✅
recipe (description)	58.8 efps (17ms)	62.5 efps (16ms)	-1ms (-5.9%)	✅
recipe (instructions)	99.9+ efps (5ms)	99.9+ efps (5ms)	+0ms (-/-%)	✅
synthetic (title)	18.5 efps (54ms)	19.6 efps (51ms)	-3ms (-5.6%)	✅
synthetic (string inside object)	19.6 efps (51ms)	20.4 efps (49ms)	-2ms (-3.9%)	✅

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark	latency	p75	p90	p99	blocking time	test duration
article (title)	39ms	43ms	59ms	451ms	679ms	10.2s
article (body)	16ms	17ms	23ms	184ms	215ms	5.2s
article (string inside object)	38ms	40ms	51ms	226ms	270ms	6.8s
article (string inside array)	43ms	45ms	49ms	87ms	271ms	7.2s
recipe (name)	19ms	21ms	23ms	40ms	0ms	6.9s
recipe (description)	17ms	19ms	20ms	29ms	0ms	4.4s
recipe (instructions)	5ms	7ms	8ms	21ms	0ms	3.0s
synthetic (title)	54ms	59ms	70ms	261ms	752ms	16.9s
synthetic (string inside object)	51ms	53ms	61ms	105ms	97ms	7.9s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark	latency	p75	p90	p99	blocking time	test duration
article (title)	37ms	41ms	58ms	504ms	766ms	10.6s
article (body)	15ms	17ms	25ms	153ms	217ms	5.3s
article (string inside object)	36ms	39ms	50ms	167ms	142ms	6.6s
article (string inside array)	44ms	47ms	49ms	161ms	393ms	7.4s
recipe (name)	16ms	18ms	20ms	29ms	0ms	7.2s
recipe (description)	16ms	17ms	19ms	33ms	0ms	4.3s
recipe (instructions)	5ms	7ms	9ms	20ms	0ms	3.0s
synthetic (title)	51ms	56ms	80ms	314ms	470ms	12.1s
synthetic (string inside object)	49ms	51ms	55ms	247ms	58ms	7.7s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

• benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
• latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
• p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
• p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
• p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
• blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
• test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

[bjoerge]

Great!