Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency @portabletext/editor to ^1.35.1 #8693

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 18, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@portabletext/editor (source) ^1.34.0 -> ^1.35.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

portabletext/editor (@​portabletext/editor)

v1.35.1

Bug Fixes
  • deprecate EditorEventListener (3c83e84)
  • don't refresh keys when dragging internally (14ec982)

v1.35.0

Features
  • behavior: provide EditorSnapshot in guards and actions (7922708)
  • markdown plugin: add code shortcut support (522afb9)
  • markdown plugin: add strike-through shortcut support (cc718d3)
Bug Fixes
  • deps: update sanity monorepo to ^3.76.1 (03e26b9)
  • deps: update sanity monorepo to ^3.76.3 (149a654)
Dependencies

v1.34.1

Bug Fixes
  • add missing originEvent on serialization.failure (9f7ce71)
  • allow serializing dragged data (a503272)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 18, 2025 15:17
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) February 18, 2025 15:17
@renovate renovate bot requested review from cngonzalez and removed request for a team February 18, 2025 15:17
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 18, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 23, 2025 4:38pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 23, 2025 4:38pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 23, 2025 4:38pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 23, 2025 4:38pm
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 23, 2025 4:38pm

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Updated and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/[email protected] 🔁 npm/[email protected] None 0 278 kB react-bot

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@portabletext/[email protected]

View full report↗︎

Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 43.02% 55108 / 128091
🔵 Statements 43.02% 55108 / 128091
🔵 Functions 48.13% 2801 / 5819
🔵 Branches 79.5% 10674 / 13425
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #30841 for commit fee38aa by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 18, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Sun, 23 Feb 2025 16:43:35 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 25.6 efps (39ms) 26.3 efps (38ms) -1ms (-2.6%)
article (body) 72.5 efps (14ms) 68.0 efps (15ms) +1ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 28.6 efps (35ms) 27.0 efps (37ms) +2ms (+5.7%)
article (string inside array) 25.0 efps (40ms) 23.8 efps (42ms) +2ms (+5.0%)
synthetic (title) 21.7 efps (46ms) 21.3 efps (47ms) +1ms (+2.2%)
synthetic (string inside object) 21.3 efps (47ms) 20.4 efps (49ms) +2ms (+4.3%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 39ms 46ms 71ms 505ms 885ms 10.8s
article (body) 14ms 17ms 30ms 203ms 207ms 5.4s
article (string inside object) 35ms 38ms 45ms 227ms 277ms 6.8s
article (string inside array) 40ms 44ms 49ms 154ms 325ms 7.0s
synthetic (title) 46ms 48ms 56ms 230ms 390ms 11.8s
synthetic (string inside object) 47ms 52ms 65ms 374ms 993ms 8.3s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 38ms 41ms 50ms 384ms 294ms 10.7s
article (body) 15ms 17ms 25ms 198ms 287ms 5.5s
article (string inside object) 37ms 39ms 49ms 77ms 317ms 6.9s
article (string inside array) 42ms 45ms 50ms 191ms 264ms 7.1s
synthetic (title) 47ms 53ms 61ms 231ms 588ms 12.3s
synthetic (string inside object) 49ms 51ms 75ms 384ms 987ms 8.1s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Component Testing Report Updated Feb 23, 2025 4:48 PM (UTC)

❌ Failed Tests (4) -- expand for details
File Status Duration Passed Skipped Failed
comments/CommentInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 23s 15 0 0
formBuilder/ArrayInput.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 14s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Annotations.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 2m 41s 3 0 3
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPaste.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 59s 11 7 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/copyPaste/CopyPasteFields.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 12 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Decorators.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 30s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DisableFocusAndUnset.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 17s 3 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/DragAndDrop.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 31s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/FocusTracking.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 16s 15 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Input.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 1m 51s 21 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/ObjectBlock.spec.tsx ❌ Failed (Inspect) 3m 1s 20 0 1
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/PresenceCursors.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 15s 3 9 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Styles.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 30s 6 0 0
formBuilder/inputs/PortableText/Toolbar.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 2m 1s 21 0 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditing.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0
formBuilder/tree-editing/TreeEditingNestedObjects.spec.tsx ✅ Passed (Inspect) 0s 0 3 0

@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency @portabletext/editor to ^1.34.1 fix(deps): update dependency @portabletext/editor to ^1.35.1 Feb 21, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-editor-1.x branch from ccc6a6c to 6557996 Compare February 21, 2025 09:41
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-editor-1.x branch from 6557996 to 2a016c2 Compare February 21, 2025 10:53
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-editor-1.x branch from 2a016c2 to 6dbf9ae Compare February 21, 2025 14:06
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/portabletext-editor-1.x branch from 6dbf9ae to 53564e1 Compare February 21, 2025 17:52
@cngonzalez cngonzalez disabled auto-merge February 21, 2025 21:43
Copy link
Member

@cngonzalez cngonzalez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Believe the failures here were only associated with issues with the CI at the time

@cngonzalez cngonzalez enabled auto-merge (squash) February 21, 2025 21:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant