Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Play 2.9 will rename some artifacts #3146

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2023

Conversation

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 20, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (77ea181) 91.03% compared to head (253c854) 91.03%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3146   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.03%   91.03%           
=======================================
  Files         162      162           
  Lines        3404     3404           
  Branches      321      321           
=======================================
  Hits         3099     3099           
  Misses        305      305           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mzuehlke mzuehlke merged commit fd2970b into scala-steward-org:main Aug 21, 2023
@mzuehlke mzuehlke added this to the 0.26.0 milestone Aug 21, 2023
@mkurz mkurz deleted the play_renamed_artifacts branch August 21, 2023 13:45
@mkurz
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkurz commented Aug 21, 2023

@mzuehlke @fthomas Any chance for a 0.25.1 release to ship this PR and also #3115?
Thanks!

@fthomas
Copy link
Member

fthomas commented Sep 13, 2023

Any chance for a 0.25.1 release to ship this PR

This PR does not need to be shipped, see

// NOTE: The latest version of this file in the scala-steward Git repository
// is loaded by every Scala Steward instance on start-up, unless it is
// started with the --disable-default-artifact-migrations option.
// Changes to this file are therefore immediately visible to all
// Scala Steward instances.

@mkurz
Copy link
Contributor Author

mkurz commented Sep 13, 2023

Still would be nice because of #3115

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants