Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use sbt-tpolecat's DevMode if CI env var is not set #3233

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 5, 2023

Conversation

fthomas
Copy link
Member

@fthomas fthomas commented Dec 5, 2023

DevMode is nicer for development because it does not set -Xfatal-warnings. More about sbt-tpolecat's modes can be found here: https://github.com/typelevel/sbt-tpolecat#modes

@fthomas fthomas added the build label Dec 5, 2023
@fthomas fthomas added this to the 0.29.0 milestone Dec 5, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (9ac858c) 91.06% compared to head (dad2748) 91.06%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3233   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.06%   91.06%           
=======================================
  Files         163      163           
  Lines        3391     3391           
  Branches      308      308           
=======================================
  Hits         3088     3088           
  Misses        303      303           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fthomas fthomas merged commit 0dd0d80 into main Dec 5, 2023
10 checks passed
@fthomas fthomas deleted the topic/tpolecat-dev-mode branch December 5, 2023 20:25
fthomas added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2023
This is not necessary anymore since
#3233.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants