Skip to content

adjusted docstrings in steinbock reader py file #165

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

LukasHats
Copy link

As discussed in here, I made a few comments in the docstrings of the steinbock reader to improve documentation and possibly also improvements to the code.

Also tagging @melonora here as we will sit together and have a look at how to improve flexibility or at least the documentation.

@melonora melonora marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2025 08:33
@melonora melonora closed this Feb 24, 2025
@melonora melonora reopened this Feb 24, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 49.50%. Comparing base (54da345) to head (7811298).
Report is 382 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #165       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   35.91%   49.50%   +13.58%     
===========================================
  Files          19       26        +7     
  Lines        1715     2705      +990     
===========================================
+ Hits          616     1339      +723     
- Misses       1099     1366      +267     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/spatialdata_io/readers/steinbock.py 38.77% <ø> (-3.45%) ⬇️

... and 21 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants