Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

significant performance improvement by making availableMethods in MethodPool a Map/HashMap #160

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

significant performance improvement by making availableMethods in MethodPool a Map/HashMap #160

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

bseiller
Copy link

@bseiller bseiller commented May 14, 2018 •
edited
Loading

a set of possible changes to get the benefits outlined in #159

@bseiller
Copy link
Author

bseiller commented May 14, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Here you go - as said, there was a minor difference in the resulting swagger.json.
If you want to pursue the idea and find the changes merge-worthy or use them a start for changing MethodPool yourself I might be able to provide a test-case that provokes this difference - but lets first see what you think.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@bseiller