Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make quality reports fault tolerant on missing relationships in metadata #489

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 1, 2023

Conversation

lajohn4747
Copy link
Contributor

@lajohn4747 lajohn4747 commented Oct 31, 2023

CU-86ayjkavn
#86ayjkavn

resolves #481

Missing relationship metadata no longer throws an error but instead returns NaN for the score report for multitable data.

@lajohn4747 lajohn4747 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2023 15:34
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (b1853d9) 77.07% compared to head (6dc6cd1) 77.02%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #489      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.07%   77.02%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          93       93              
  Lines        3416     3425       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits         2633     2638       +5     
- Misses        783      787       +4     
Files Coverage Δ
...orts/multi_table/_properties/inter_table_trends.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
sdmetrics/reports/multi_table/_properties/base.py 94.59% <73.33%> (-5.41%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@npatki npatki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! (Not as familiar with details of the codebase but based on the tests, the functionality is working as expected.)

Copy link
Contributor

@amontanez24 amontanez24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@lajohn4747 lajohn4747 merged commit 43b4878 into main Nov 1, 2023
45 checks passed
@lajohn4747 lajohn4747 deleted the issue-481-no-crash-no-relation branch November 1, 2023 20:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reports should not crash if there are no relationships
4 participants