Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replace old static annotation with a more dynamic way #27

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 6, 2023

Conversation

sebastian-toepfer
Copy link
Owner

currently unclear if it is the right way or must we implement the keywords in a more mutable state and use this for the annotion.

@sebastian-toepfer sebastian-toepfer force-pushed the annotation_need_to_be_more_dynamic branch from e3043fa to 26a193f Compare October 5, 2023 19:26
@sebastian-toepfer sebastian-toepfer marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2023 18:23
currently unclear if it is the right way or must we implement the
keywords in a more mutable state and use this for the annotion.
@sebastian-toepfer sebastian-toepfer force-pushed the annotation_need_to_be_more_dynamic branch from 26a193f to ffc6642 Compare October 6, 2023 18:24
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Oct 6, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@sebastian-toepfer sebastian-toepfer merged commit a166fe8 into main Oct 6, 2023
3 checks passed
@sebastian-toepfer sebastian-toepfer deleted the annotation_need_to_be_more_dynamic branch October 6, 2023 19:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant