Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
webos: webos.inc: respect IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX and IMAGE_MACHINE_SUFFIX,…
… drop WEBOS_IMAGE_NAME_PARTITION_SUFFIX :Release Notes: Drop unused WEBOS_IMAGE_NAME_PARTITION_SUFFIX, respect IMAGE_MACHINE_SUFFIX and add IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX IMAGE_MACHINE_SUFFIX was added in: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=6e82c394e98d57a2fe73e547922477cd6b0620f9 IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX added to IMAGE_NAME in: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=26d97acc71379ab6702fa54a23b6542a3f51779c :Detailed Notes: * ${IMAGE_NAME}${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX} is almost always used together already and when they aren't it's usually because of hardcoded '.rootfs' suffix * it's a bit strange, because ${IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX} is applied after the version from ${IMAGE_VERSION_SUFFIX}, if we move it to ${IMAGE_LINK_NAME} then it will be applied before the version and ${IMAGE_LINK_NAME} will be just the version-less symlink to latest built version. * it's not added to INITRAMFS_IMAGE_NAME as it assumes that all images used as initramfs will set IMAGE_NAME_SUFFIX to empty. Many already do as shown bellow, but you might need to extend this list in your layer. * unfortunately this whole build artifact naming changes were rejected upstream in: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/topic/102747718#191102 https://patchwork.yoctoproject.org/project/oe-core/list/?series=19541 https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12937 :Testing Performed: Only build tested. :QA Notes: No change to image. :Issues Addressed: [WRQ-691] Create GPVB with Yocto 4.3 Nanbield Change-Id: Id50c8047f99e65b23d57aa88b29d216f8dec004f
- Loading branch information