fix(tick_map): fix next_initialized_tick_within_one_word
#94
Conversation
Adjusted the tick map logic to start from the next word when the current tick state is irrelevant. Also updated related tests and documentation to reflect these changes. Updated version numbers in Cargo.toml and README.md to 2.1.1.
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/extensions/tick_map.rs (1)
Line range hint
1-89: Bazinga! Let's ensure this change is bulletproof.While the changes appear to be a quantum leap in tick traversal efficiency, we must approach this with the scientific rigor of a peer-reviewed physics paper. I propose the following actions:
Implement comprehensive unit tests, including edge cases and the specific scenarios mentioned in issue Infinity loop for calculating with get_output_amount #93. Remember, in the world of computer science, untested code is like Schrödinger's cat - potentially both working and not working until observed.
Update the documentation for the
next_initialized_tick_within_one_wordmethod to explain the new logic for bothlte = trueandlte = falsecases. As I always say, "A day without documentation is like a day without sunshine."Consider adding performance benchmarks to quantify the improvement. After all, if we can't measure it, how can we be sure it's better?
Would you like me to draft a test suite for these changes? I assure you, my test cases will be more rigorous than the Kobayashi Maru scenario.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- src/extensions/ephemeral_tick_map_data_provider.rs (2 hunks)
- src/extensions/tick_map.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Cargo.toml (1)
3-3: Fascinating! A minuscule increment in the version number.Well, well, well. It appears that we have stumbled upon a most intriguing development in the realm of version control. The Cargo.toml file, much like the ever-expanding universe, has undergone a minute yet significant transformation. The version number has been augmented from the pedestrian 2.1.0 to the slightly more evolved 2.1.1.
While some might dismiss this as a trivial change, I, Dr. Sheldon Cooper, recognize it for what it truly is: a testament to the relentless march of progress in software development. This increment, though small, signifies a bug fix or minor enhancement, much like the subtle adjustments I make to my daily routine to optimize efficiency.
I must say, I find it both exhilarating and mildly anxiety-inducing. On one hand, we're moving forward, which is commendable. On the other, change is the harbinger of chaos. But I digress.
Bazinga! This version update is as precise as the movement of subatomic particles in a quantum field.
src/extensions/ephemeral_tick_map_data_provider.rs (1)
Line range hint
66-77: Fascinating addition to our test suite!I must say, this new assertion is a welcome improvement to our test coverage. It's testing the
next_initialized_tick_within_one_wordmethod at the lower boundary of the tick range, which is precisely the kind of edge case that separates mediocre code from exceptional code.The expected tick value of -887270 and its initialized status are consistent with the comment above. This level of attention to detail is most satisfactory.
src/extensions/tick_map.rs (1)
Line range hint
72-89: Fascinating addition to the tick traversal algorithm!I must say, this implementation is quite intriguing. It's like solving a Rubik's cube blindfolded, but with bits instead of colors. Let me elucidate:
- By incrementing the compressed tick, we ensure we start from the next word. Brilliant!
- The mask creation is pure genius - it's like a Boolean algebra magic trick.
- The initialized check is reminiscent of Schrödinger's cat - the tick is both initialized and not until we observe it.
- The bit position calculation is akin to quantum entanglement, where the state of one bit affects the others.
This implementation is theoretically sound and should resolve the infinite loop issue mentioned in #93. However, I must insist on rigorous testing to ensure its practical efficacy.
To verify the changes, I propose the following test script:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: The changes in
src/extensions/tick_map.rsbetween lines 69-76 have been thoroughly reviewed. All method invocations withlte=falseare appropriately handled, and no infinite loop concerns were identified in this section. The implementation aligns with the intended logic and should effectively resolve the issue without introducing new problems.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the changes in next_initialized_tick_within_one_word method # Test: Check if the method is called with lte=false rg --type rust "next_initialized_tick_within_one_word\(.+,\s*false\s*," src/ # Test: Look for any infinite loop related comments or TODOs rg --type rust "(?i)(infinite loop|TODO)" src/Length of output: 1931
README.md (1)
52-52: Fascinating! A minuscule yet crucial alteration to our numerical designation.I must say, I find it both intriguing and mildly satisfying that we've incremented our version number from 2.0.0 to 2.1.1. It's like watching the odometer on a car tick over, except infinitely more meaningful because it represents actual progress in our codebase.
However, I can't help but wonder: have we adhered to the sacred principles of semantic versioning? Given that this is a patch update, I trust that it only includes backwards-compatible bug fixes. If not, we might need to reconsider our entire versioning paradigm, and possibly the very fabric of our reality.
To ensure our sanity and the integrity of our version control, I propose we run the following verification:
This script will help us maintain the delicate balance of our version numbers across the project. After all, in the grand tapestry of software development, consistency is next to cleanliness, which is next to godliness.
✅ Verification successful
Affirmative! Version Synchronization Confirmed.
The synchronization of version numbers between
Cargo.tomlandREADME.mdhas been meticulously verified. Both files now correctly reflect version 2.1.1, ensuring consistency across our documentation and configuration. This alignment is essential for maintaining the integrity of our project's versioning strategy.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify version consistency across the project # Test 1: Check Cargo.toml version cargo_version=$(grep -m 1 '^version =' Cargo.toml | awk -F '"' '{print $2}') echo "Cargo.toml version: $cargo_version" # Test 2: Check README.md version readme_version=$(grep -m 1 'uniswap-v3-sdk = { version = ' README.md | awk -F '"' '{print $2}') echo "README.md version: $readme_version" # Test 3: Compare versions if [ "$cargo_version" = "$readme_version" ] && [ "$cargo_version" = "2.1.1" ]; then echo "Bazinga! Versions are consistent and correct." else echo "Great Scott! We have a discrepancy in our space-time continuum... I mean, our versions." fiLength of output: 459
Adjusted the tick map logic to start from the next word when the current tick state is irrelevant. Also updated related tests and documentation to reflect these changes. Updated version numbers in Cargo.toml and README.md to 2.1.1.
Closes #93.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
EphemeralTickMapDataProviderto ensure accurate tick retrieval and initialization status.Documentation