[Merged by Bors] - Revive mplex #4619
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pawanjay176
added
ready-for-review
|
@jxs tagging because not able to add you as a reviewer for some reason. |
jxs
reviewed
Aug 16, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks Pawan, LGTM.
Wasn't aware of the required support of mplex on the consensus-specs. According to libp2p/specs#553 it seems both Nimbus and Lodestar folks are moving to Yamux.
Wdyt of opening a PR updating the specs on consensus-specs deprecating Mplex, to be merged when every client supports it as the first option ?
CC @AgeManning
jxs
approved these changes
Aug 16, 2023
Merged
AgeManning
approved these changes
Aug 21, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yep, nice catch.
Didn't notice we removed it. As far as I know js, nim & java don't have yamux yet, so I think we inadvertantly removed support for connections to nimbus, lodestar and teku.
I believe they are all planning on upgrading, so we should maintain mplex at least for the time being.
AgeManning
added
ready-for-merge
|
bors r+ |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
## Issue Addressed N/A ## Proposed Changes In #4431 , we seem to have removed support for mplex as it is being deprecated in libp2p. See libp2p/specs#553 . Related rust-libp2p PR libp2p/rust-libp2p#3920 However, since this isn't part of the official [consensus specs](https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md#multiplexing), we still need to support mplex. > Clients MUST support [mplex](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/tree/master/mplex) and MAY support [yamux](https://github.com/hashicorp/yamux/blob/master/spec.md). This PR adds back mplex support as before.
|
Build failed: |
|
bors r+ |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
## Issue Addressed N/A ## Proposed Changes In #4431 , we seem to have removed support for mplex as it is being deprecated in libp2p. See libp2p/specs#553 . Related rust-libp2p PR libp2p/rust-libp2p#3920 However, since this isn't part of the official [consensus specs](https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md#multiplexing), we still need to support mplex. > Clients MUST support [mplex](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/tree/master/mplex) and MAY support [yamux](https://github.com/hashicorp/yamux/blob/master/spec.md). This PR adds back mplex support as before.
|
Build failed (retrying...): |
|
bors r- |
|
Canceled. |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 24, 2023
## Issue Addressed N/A ## Proposed Changes In #4431 , we seem to have removed support for mplex as it is being deprecated in libp2p. See libp2p/specs#553 . Related rust-libp2p PR libp2p/rust-libp2p#3920 However, since this isn't part of the official [consensus specs](https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md#multiplexing), we still need to support mplex. > Clients MUST support [mplex](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/tree/master/mplex) and MAY support [yamux](https://github.com/hashicorp/yamux/blob/master/spec.md). This PR adds back mplex support as before.
|
Pull request successfully merged into unstable. Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.
|
Woodpile37
pushed a commit
to Woodpile37/lighthouse
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2024
N/A In sigp#4431 , we seem to have removed support for mplex as it is being deprecated in libp2p. See libp2p/specs#553 . Related rust-libp2p PR libp2p/rust-libp2p#3920 However, since this isn't part of the official [consensus specs](https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md#multiplexing), we still need to support mplex. > Clients MUST support [mplex](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/tree/master/mplex) and MAY support [yamux](https://github.com/hashicorp/yamux/blob/master/spec.md). This PR adds back mplex support as before.
Woodpile37
pushed a commit
to Woodpile37/lighthouse
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2024
N/A In sigp#4431 , we seem to have removed support for mplex as it is being deprecated in libp2p. See libp2p/specs#553 . Related rust-libp2p PR libp2p/rust-libp2p#3920 However, since this isn't part of the official [consensus specs](https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/phase0/p2p-interface.md#multiplexing), we still need to support mplex. > Clients MUST support [mplex](https://github.com/libp2p/specs/tree/master/mplex) and MAY support [yamux](https://github.com/hashicorp/yamux/blob/master/spec.md). This PR adds back mplex support as before.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue Addressed
N/A
Proposed Changes
In #4431 , we seem to have removed support for mplex as it is being deprecated in libp2p. See libp2p/specs#553 . Related rust-libp2p PR libp2p/rust-libp2p#3920
However, since this isn't part of the official consensus specs, we still need to support mplex.
This PR adds back mplex support as before.