-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for grazing-incidence exit angles and polar angle #2380
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
… grazingincidence_exitangles
In the first image, while incident_angle=0.0, the exit angle is 0.0 in q=0, which is also the horizon This example is just for visualize the difference, if the images are integrated using the angle units, there is no missing wedge |
In a real example, we would integrate using the angle units:
|
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
… grazingincidence_exitangles
needs to fix #2389 |
The units called previously exit angles should be "scattering_angles" in the classic way, because they don't depend on incident and tilt angles. Rotations are applied to q units.
Now, the unit called "exit angle" is used in the grazing-incidence community for the scattering angle with the origin in the horizon of the thin film, now dependant on the incident and tilt angles
The "exit_angles" support is especially useful for SAXS experiments