-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 537
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dev´s #261
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
dev´s #261
Conversation
Feel free to integrate it, if you have some ideas? |
This is compiling on my end |
The test breaks becouse most MCUs does not have the CORDIC. It needs to be contained within these defines.
Oooof.... In terms of the CORDIC stuff, this won't work like this. I don't want to merge anything related to CORDIC into the main library. It's not useful to 99.8% of our users, and it will make all the test-builds fail if left in like this. In terms of the 8-PWM stuff, I can't follow all these changes :-)
These are relevant questions because the code can't just work on any PWM pins - I believe in the 8-PWM configuration requires complementary PWMs, like in 6-PWM? That means the complimentary signals have to come from the same timer. But they don't necessarily have to use CHx CHxN pins - it can also work with CHx CHy - but then there is no HW dead-time, only software. Also you can't mix and match hardware dead-time and software dead-time - it's either one or the other for all the pins. And you can't use CHxN on the high side, e.g. you can only use those when doing all HW dead-time. |
No description provided.