-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
core/capabilities/ccip: bump chainlink-ccip #1284
Conversation
include fixes from smartcontractkit/chainlink-ccip#60
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | |||
package superfakes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's with the package name? mocks
or something makes more sense to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Its not really a mock, made this the pkg name mainly because it is hopefully short lived
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe add a TODO in case it's forgotten.
{ | ||
name: "allowOOO set to true makes no difference to final gas estimate", | ||
args: args{dataLen: 5, numTokens: 2, extraArgs: makeExtraArgsV2(200_000, true)}, | ||
want: 1_022_264, | ||
}, | ||
{ | ||
name: "allowOOO set to false makes no difference to final gas estimate", | ||
args: args{dataLen: 5, numTokens: 2, extraArgs: makeExtraArgsV2(200_000, false)}, | ||
want: 1_022_264, | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These test cases are new
{ | ||
name: "v2 extra args", | ||
numRequests: 3, | ||
dataLength: len([]byte{0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}), | ||
numberOfTokens: 1, | ||
extraArgs: makeExtraArgsV2(200_000, true), | ||
want: 678_508, | ||
}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As is this
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
## Motivation Recent merges to chainlink-ccip have caused the integration test to break. ## Solution Include the gas estimator changes required as well as some token data reader changes. Include fixes from smartcontractkit/chainlink-ccip#60
Motivation
Recent merges to chainlink-ccip have caused the integration test to break.
Solution
Include the gas estimator changes required as well as some token data reader changes.
Include fixes from smartcontractkit/chainlink-ccip#60