-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TT-444] Makes Keeper Benchmark Tests Resilient to Failure #10402
Conversation
I see that you haven't updated any README files. Would it make sense to do so? |
I see that you haven't updated any CHANGELOG files. Would it make sense to do so? |
Running downstream job at https://github.com/smartcontractkit/operator-ui/actions/runs/6147934863 |
Running downstream job at https://github.com/smartcontractkit/operator-ui/actions/runs/6147936075 |
…resilientKeeperSoak
Running downstream job at https://github.com/smartcontractkit/operator-ui/actions/runs/6147964235 |
Running downstream job at https://github.com/smartcontractkit/operator-ui/actions/runs/6147975549 |
Running downstream job at https://github.com/smartcontractkit/operator-ui/actions/runs/6148882863 |
Running downstream job at https://github.com/smartcontractkit/operator-ui/actions/runs/6149323932 |
Running downstream job at https://github.com/smartcontractkit/operator-ui/actions/runs/6149378025 |
Running downstream job at https://github.com/smartcontractkit/operator-ui/actions/runs/6149444260 |
Running downstream job at https://github.com/smartcontractkit/operator-ui/actions/runs/6149457716 |
SonarQube Quality Gate
|
Keeper tests suffer from many of the same resiliency issues as we've seen in CCIP and OCR soak: