replace camel case with sentence case

faq.md

@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ If a proposal does not reach the required quorum, it is considered as not passed
 
 ![](<.gitbook/assets/image (9) (3).png>)
 
-Due to multiple spam attacks on Snapshot all Spaces are now required to set up a Proposal Validation. \
+Due to multiple spam attacks on Snapshot all Spaces are now required to set up a Proposal validation. \
 Head here to learn how to do it: [#how-to-use-validation-strategies](user-guides/strategies/validation-strategies.md#how-to-use-validation-strategies "mention")
 
 </details>
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ You can submit your request by following the process described in the [token-ver
 
 <summary>Are there any solutions available to minimize whales' power in the voting process?</summary>
 
-Absolutely! Have a look at the Quaratic Voting system (bear in mind that it should be parie
+Absolutely! Have a look at the Quaratic Voting type (bear in mind that it should be parie
 
 </details>
 
@@ -376,12 +376,12 @@ Yes, you can customize the appearance of your Snapshot space to some extent by s
 
 <details>
 
-<summary>Your proposal cannot be submitted due to a missing Voting Validation rule required with the "ticket" strategy. What does it mean?</summary>
+<summary>Your proposal cannot be submitted due to a missing Voting validation rule required with the "ticket" strategy. What does it mean?</summary>
 
 ![](<.gitbook/assets/image (2) (2).png>)
 
-If your space is using only a [ticket](https://snapshot.org/#/strategy/ticket) Voting Strategy you are required to set a Voting Validation to minimize the risk of spam votes on your proposals. \
-Without it, hackers can easily create multiple accounts (each getting 1 Voting Power) and take the voting process over.\
+If your space is using only a [ticket](https://snapshot.org/#/strategy/ticket) Voting strategy you are required to set a Voting validation to minimize the risk of spam votes on your proposals. \
+Without it, hackers can easily create multiple accounts (each getting 1 Voting power) and take the voting process over.\
 \
 Have a read here to learn how to set it up: [#voting-validation-in-space-settings](user-guides/strategies/validation-strategies.md#voting-validation-in-space-settings "mention")
 

space-handbook/README.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ description: Find the best solution for your use case!
 # Space handbook
 
 {% hint style="info" %}
-**This handbook uses terms like** [**Voting**](#user-content-fn-1)[^1] **and** [**Validation Strategies**](#user-content-fn-2)[^2]**,** [**Voting types**](#user-content-fn-3)[^3]**.** \
+**This handbook uses terms like** [**Voting**](#user-content-fn-1)[^1] **and** [**Validation strategies**](#user-content-fn-2)[^2]**,** [**Voting types**](#user-content-fn-3)[^3]**.** \
 \
 Make sure to learn about those concepts before diving into this chapter! \
 \
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ If none of the above are a good fit for your Space, we encourage you to use the
 
 Feel free to reach out to us on [Discord](https://discord.com/channels/707079246388133940/1090290400943677440) to suggest use cases that we did not cover!
 
-[^1]: Voting Strategies are used to calculated user's Voting Power. [Read more here](../user-guides/strategies/voting-strategies.md).
+[^1]: Voting strategies are used to calculated user's Voting power. [Read more here](../user-guides/strategies/voting-strategies.md).
 
-[^2]: Validation Strategies are used to define if a user is eligible to vote or create a proposal. [Read more here](../user-guides/strategies/validation-strategies.md).
+[^2]: Validation strategies are used to define if a user is eligible to vote or create a proposal. [Read more here](../user-guides/strategies/validation-strategies.md).
 
-[^3]: Voting Systems relate to how users can cast their votes and how the final results of a proposal is calculated. [Read more here.](../user-guides/proposals/voting-types.md)
+[^3]: Voting types relate to how users can cast their votes and how the final results of a proposal is calculated. [Read more here.](../user-guides/proposals/voting-types.md)

space-handbook/anti-whale.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ description: >-
 > \
 > [_https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bitcoin-whale.asp_](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/bitcoin-whale.asp)
 
-Whales can influence not only currency markets but also the governance process of web3 communities. With the large holdings, their sheer Voting Power can oftentimes swing a proposal for their advantage. This leads to outcomes that are not welcomed by the community, poses a threat to taking the Treasury over, and also to lowering community participation in the vote as its members don't see the point in voting knowing that one wallet can decide on its outcome.
+Whales can influence not only currency markets but also the governance process of web3 communities. With the large holdings, their sheer Voting power can oftentimes swing a proposal for their advantage. This leads to outcomes that are not welcomed by the community, poses a threat to taking the Treasury over, and also to lowering community participation in the vote as its members don't see the point in voting knowing that one wallet can decide on its outcome.
 
 Let's have a look at different setups that will allow your space to minimize the power of whales.
 
@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ You can predefine the [Voting type](#user-content-fn-1)[^1] that all proposals i
 
 ### 1. Quadratic voting
 
-Snapshot's Quadratic Voting type is based on the Quadratic Funding model and was developed to target shortcomings of the traditional quadratic calculation taking the root square of a value, in our case - Voting Power. Unlike the traditional quadratic calculation, it can handle values as tiny as 0.000001 and include them in the voting process.
+Snapshot's Quadratic Voting type is based on the Quadratic Funding model and was developed to target shortcomings of the traditional quadratic calculation taking the root square of a value, in our case - Voting power. Unlike the traditional quadratic calculation, it can handle values as tiny as 0.000001 and include them in the voting process.
 
-You can set it up for all proposals in your Space by heading to the **Voting** tab in the Space settings and selecting the desired Voting System in the **Type** field:
+You can set it up for all proposals in your Space by heading to the **Voting** tab in the Space settings and selecting the desired Voting type in the **Type** field:
 
 <figure><img src="../.gitbook/assets/Screenshot 2023-06-12 at 15.26.16.png" alt=""><figcaption></figcaption></figure>
 
@@ -77,11 +77,11 @@ So the percentages for each choice is:&#x20;
 * C: 58.69% of 225 = **132 SMS**
 
 {% hint style="info" %}
-All in all you don't have to understand each step of the calculation, yet it should give you an idea how John with 100 SMS tokens was not able to push through his choice despite having the majority of Voting Power in the group as Quadratic Funding model emphasises the **number of individual contributors** rather than the amount contributed.
+All in all you don't have to understand each step of the calculation, yet it should give you an idea how John with 100 SMS tokens was not able to push through his choice despite having the majority of Voting power in the group as Quadratic Funding model emphasises the **number of individual contributors** rather than the amount contributed.
 {% endhint %}
 
 {% hint style="danger" %}
-This Voting System may encourage the whales to create multiple wallets and split their holdings among them. Therefore it's important to also implement a mechanism providing Sybil Resistance. \
+This Voting type may encourage the whales to create multiple wallets and split their holdings among them. Therefore it's important to also implement a mechanism providing Sybil Resistance. \
 \
 **Read more** [**here**](sybil-resistance-scam-and-spam-prevention.md)**!**
 {% endhint %}
@@ -90,14 +90,14 @@ This Voting System may encourage the whales to create multiple wallets and split
 
 ### 1. [balance-of-with-thresholds](https://snapshot.org/#/strategy/balance-of-with-thresholds)
 
-You can think of it as creating multiple buckets which will determine the Voting Power of an individual address. To put it in the simplest way, imagine that:
+You can think of it as creating multiple buckets which will determine the Voting power of an individual address. To put it in the simplest way, imagine that:
 
-* users who hold less than 5 tokens will have **0** Voting Power
-* users who hold from 5 to 10 tokens will have **1** Voting Power
-* users who hold from 10 to 20 tokens will have **2** Voting Power
-* users who hold more than 20 tokens will have **5** Voting Power
+* users who hold less than 5 tokens will have **0** Voting power
+* users who hold from 5 to 10 tokens will have **1** Voting power
+* users who hold from 10 to 20 tokens will have **2** Voting power
+* users who hold more than 20 tokens will have **5** Voting power
 
-As you can see, you are able to set various thresholds which will fix user's Voting Power at a specific level. This way whales who may have large holdings, for example 1000 tokens, will not get more than **5** Voting Power.&#x20;
+As you can see, you are able to set various thresholds which will fix user's Voting power at a specific level. This way whales who may have large holdings, for example 1000 tokens, will not get more than **5** Voting power.&#x20;
 
 This way the voting can be more reflective of the public opinion.
 
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ You can test it out in the **Playground on Snapshot**:
 
 ### 2.[ anti-whale](https://snapshot.org/#/strategy/anti-whale)
 
-This strategy executes a chosen Voting Strategy and applies algorithms to its result to reduce the impact of big wallets on the vote.&#x20;
+This strategy executes a chosen Voting strategy and applies algorithms to its result to reduce the impact of big wallets on the vote.&#x20;
 
 {% hint style="info" %}
 This strategy requires understanding some of the calculations shown below. If you have issues with setting it up don't hesitate to [create a ticket on Discord](https://discord.com/channels/707079246388133940/1090290400943677440)!
@@ -132,10 +132,10 @@ In practice, the strategy sets a **soft restriction on the voting threshold** by
 
 As an example, assuming our threshold is **5**:
 
-* if user's Voting Power is below or equal to 5, their final Voting Power will be moderately increased
-* if user's Voting Power is above 5, their final Voting Power will be reduced (the higher the Voting Power, the more increased it will be)
+* if user's Voting power is below or equal to 5, their final Voting power will be moderately increased
+* if user's Voting power is above 5, their final Voting power will be reduced (the higher the Voting power, the more increased it will be)
 
-The following algorithm is applied to the result of the configured Voting Strategy:
+The following algorithm is applied to the result of the configured Voting strategy:
 
 ```
 If result > antiWhale.threshold

space-handbook/custom-calculations.md

@@ -7,19 +7,19 @@ description: >-
 
 # Custom calculations
 
-Snapshot provides several Voting Strategies that allow you to use your own API to return user's Voting Power or for example perform mathematical calculations on the results from existing Strategies.
+Snapshot provides several Voting strategies that allow you to use your own API to return user's Voting power or for example perform mathematical calculations on the results from existing Strategies.
 
 {% hint style="info" %}
-You can also create a new custom Voting or Validation Strategy if none of the available solutions meet your needs. \
+You can also create a new custom Voting or Validation strategy if none of the available solutions meet your needs. \
 \
 Have a look at the [create-a-strategy](../developer-guides/create-a-strategy/ "mention") section of this documentation to learn more!
 {% endhint %}
 
 ### [api-v2](https://snapshot.org/#/strategy/api-v2)
 
-This strategy allows off-chain data to be used as Voting Power through calling a custom API endpoint to request the score for a set of addresses.
+This strategy allows off-chain data to be used as Voting power through calling a custom API endpoint to request the score for a set of addresses.
 
-It's useful to use this strategy if your API can return the Voting Power directly. It's network agnostic.  
+It's useful to use this strategy if your API can return the Voting power directly. It's network agnostic.  
 
 **Strategy setup:**
 
@@ -75,21 +75,21 @@ You can test it out in the **Playground on Snapshot:**
 You can use the `math` strategy flexibly with various tokens and networks. This example demonstrates how to set a threshold taking into account tokens on different chains.
 {% endhint %}
 
-`Math` strategy is powerful in its composability. It allows you to apply common mathematical operations to the outputs of Voting Strategies.
+`Math` strategy is powerful in its composability. It allows you to apply common mathematical operations to the outputs of Voting strategies.
 
-As an example, you can take a square root of the Voting Power calculated by [erc20-balance-of](https://snapshot.org/#/strategy/erc20-balance-of), or the lower (`min`) value out of two different Voting Strategies. You can see all possibilities on the [strategy page](https://snapshot.org/#/strategy/math).
+As an example, you can take a square root of the Voting power calculated by [erc20-balance-of](https://snapshot.org/#/strategy/erc20-balance-of), or the lower (`min`) value out of two different Voting strategies. You can see all possibilities on the [strategy page](https://snapshot.org/#/strategy/math).
 
 #### How to set it up for a multichain scenario?
 
-If the Voting Power calculated for your space is based on tokens on different chains and you want to set a minimum threshold defining if a user is eligible to vote, you can use the `a-if-lt-b` operand. Don't worry if it sounds cryptic, we will go through it step by step. 
+If the Voting power calculated for your space is based on tokens on different chains and you want to set a minimum threshold defining if a user is eligible to vote, you can use the `a-if-lt-b` operand. Don't worry if it sounds cryptic, we will go through it step by step. 
 
 | Operation   | Operand count | Description               |
 | ----------- | ------------- | ------------------------- |
 | `a-if-lt-b` | 3             | (x, a, b) = x < b ? a : x |
 
 Let's look at the formula first: `(x, a, b) = x < b ? a : x`, where:&#x20;
 
-* **x** - sum of Voting Power calculated by the two Voting Strategies on chains `137` and `1` (as per the example below)
+* **x** - sum of Voting power calculated by the two Voting strategies on chains `137` and `1` (as per the example below)
 * **a** - first constant, in our case it's **0**
 * **b** - first constant, in our case it's **100**
 
@@ -140,10 +140,10 @@ Let's look at the formula first: `(x, a, b) = x < b ? a : x`, where:&#x20;
 
 The algorithm will check if **x** is smaller than **b**, the second constant:
 
-* if it's below **b**, the final Voting Power will be set to **a,** first constant -> **0**
-* if it's equal to and higher than **b**, the final Voting Power will be set to **x**, the sum of result from the Voting Strategies
+* if it's below **b**, the final Voting power will be set to **a,** first constant -> **0**
+* if it's equal to and higher than **b**, the final Voting power will be set to **x**, the sum of result from the Voting strategies
 
-**As you can see we can easily define what is the minimum Voting Power (our example: 100) coming from different chains that is required for the user to vote!**&#x20;
+**As you can see we can easily define what is the minimum Voting power (our example: 100) coming from different chains that is required for the user to vote!**&#x20;
 
 You can test it out in the **Playground on Snapshot**: