-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 583
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add RCV Copeland voting system #1072
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
If votes are [
{ choice: [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ], balance: 0.5, scores: [ 0.5 ] },
{ choice: [ 2, 1, 3, 4 ], balance: 2.3, scores: [ 2.3 ] },
{ choice: [ 1, 3, 2, 4 ], balance: 0.7, scores: [ 0.7 ] },
{ choice: [ 2, 1 ], balance: 1.1, scores: [ 1.1 ] },
{ choice: [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ], balance: 1, scores: [ 1 ] },
{ choice: [ 2, 1, 3, 4 ], balance: 1, scores: [ 1 ] },
{ choice: [ 1, 3, 2, 4 ], balance: 1, scores: [ 1 ] },
{ choice: [ 2, 1 ], balance: 1, scores: [ 1 ] }
] Scores are expected to be |
Also Copeland scores are not equal to voting power 🤔 how do we handle quorum in this case I mean results are not really based on voting power, instead it is calculated based on wins/losses with other choice |
Add new voting system, ranked choice voting with Copeland's method. This was suggested by ENS DAO.