fix: Corrections to Typographical Errors in Documentation #3
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve textual modifications across several documentation files, primarily focusing on grammatical corrections and clarity improvements. Key updates include correcting phrases, fixing spelling errors, and updating a document title to enhance readability. The underlying content and functionality of the documents remain unchanged, ensuring that the information presented is clear and accurate. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Document
participant System
User->>Document: Request update
Document->>System: Apply grammatical corrections
System-->>Document: Corrections applied
Document-->>User: Updated document
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
developers-guides/security/multisig-committee.md (4)
1-3: Consider clarifying the "stage 1" referenceWhile the title correction is appropriate, the reference to "stage 1" in the introduction might need additional context for new readers to understand the project's roadmap.
Consider adding a brief explanation or a link to the roadmap documentation where stages are detailed.
Line range hint
9-11: Consider adding more details about the community member selection processWhile the document mentions gathering community feedback for selecting an additional member, it would be helpful to provide:
- Timeline for the selection process
- Specific criteria for candidate evaluation
- Link to where the public forum discussions will take place
Line range hint
13-15: Remove unnecessary HTML space entityThe
 HTML entity for space is unnecessary in Markdown.-This is to ensure no one can act maliciously and can be immediately stopped by others.  +This is to ensure no one can act maliciously and can be immediately stopped by others.
Line range hint
17-25: Improve list formatting consistencyThe current list formatting can be improved:
- Remove unnecessary HTML space entities
- Use consistent Markdown list formatting
Consider this format:
-Joseph Lallouz (Bison Trail) - -Michael Repetny (Marinade Finance)  - -Robert Chen (Osec) - -Solayer Core Team (2 keys) +Current multisig holders: +* Joseph Lallouz (Bison Trail) +* Michael Repetny (Marinade Finance) +* Robert Chen (Osec) +* Solayer Core Team (2 keys)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
community/solayer-valley-episodes/unstaking-credit-deduction.md(2 hunks)developers-guides/security/multisig-committee.md(1 hunks)docs/Overview/additional-features.md(1 hunks)docs/Overview/basics.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- community/solayer-valley-episodes/unstaking-credit-deduction.md
- docs/Overview/basics.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/Overview/additional-features.md
[style] ~14-~14: The phrase “a variety of” may be wordy. To make your writing clearer, consider replacing it.
Context: ...operation Running software to validate a variety of AVS protocols is a task that is best le...
(A_VARIETY_OF)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
developers-guides/security/multisig-committee.md (1)
Line range hint 5-7: Verify the accuracy of the multisig and program addresses
These addresses are critical security information. Let's verify their correctness.
✅ Verification successful
Addresses are consistent across documentation
The verification confirms that both addresses are used consistently across the documentation:
- The multisig address
GcYvLKKEWpxQMqFe9HUcDJYMGvXt7kwf8gfBvjnW4wnmappears only in the multisig committee documentation - The program ID
sSo1iU21jBrU9VaJ8PJib1MtorefUV4fzC9GURa2KNnis consistently referenced in both the multisig committee documentation and the Solayer programs documentation where it's identified as the "Restaking Pool Manager" program
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any inconsistencies in the multisig and program addresses across the documentation
# Check for the multisig address
echo "Checking multisig address consistency..."
rg -i "GcYvLKKEWpxQMqFe9HUcDJYMGvXt7kwf8gfBvjnW4wnm"
# Check for the program ID
echo "Checking program ID consistency..."
rg -i "sSo1iU21jBrU9VaJ8PJib1MtorefUV4fzC9GURa2KNn"
Length of output: 931
This pull request addresses and corrects typographical errors found across multiple documentation files, as follows:
unstaking-credit-deduction.md
multisig-committee.md
additional-features.md
basics.md
Summary by CodeRabbit
unstaking-credit-deduction.mddocument.multisig-committee.mddocument.additional-features.mdandbasics.mddocuments.