Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Add feature_taproot case involved invalid internal pubkey
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
sipa committed Nov 21, 2022
1 parent 1c5c951 commit 5d413c8
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 52 additions and 4 deletions.
47 changes: 46 additions & 1 deletion test/functional/feature_taproot.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -96,7 +96,14 @@
assert_equal,
random_bytes,
)
from test_framework.key import generate_privkey, compute_xonly_pubkey, sign_schnorr, tweak_add_privkey, ECKey
from test_framework.key import (
generate_privkey,
compute_xonly_pubkey,
sign_schnorr,
tweak_add_privkey,
ECKey,
SECP256K1
)
from test_framework.address import (
hash160,
program_to_witness,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -661,6 +668,44 @@ def spenders_taproot_active():
# Test with signature with bit flipped.
add_spender(spenders, "sig/bitflip", tap=tap, key=secs[0], failure={"signature": bitflipper(default_signature)}, **ERR_SIG_SCHNORR)

# == Test involving an internal public key not on the curve ==

# X-only public keys are 32 bytes, but not every 32-byte array is a valid public key; only
# around 50% of them are. This does not affect users using correct software; these "keys" have
# no corresponding private key, and thus will never appear as output of key
# generation/derivation/tweaking.
#
# Using an invalid public key as P2TR output key makes the UTXO unspendable. Revealing an
# invalid public key as internal key in a P2TR script path spend also makes the spend invalid.
# These conditions are explicitly spelled out in BIP341.
#
# It is however hard to create test vectors for this, because it involves "guessing" how a
# hypothetical incorrect implementation deals with an obviously-invalid condition, and making
# sure that guessed behavior (accepting it in certain condition) doesn't occur.
#
# The test case added here tries to detect a very specific bug a verifier could have: if they
# don't verify whether or not a revealed internal public key in a script path spend is valid,
# and (correctly) implement output_key == tweak(internal_key, tweakval) but (incorrectly) treat
# tweak(invalid_key, tweakval) as equal the public key corresponding to private key tweakval.
# This may seem like a far-fetched edge condition to test for, but in fact, the BIP341 wallet
# pseudocode did exactly that (but obviously only triggerable by someone invoking the tweaking
# function with an invalid public key, which shouldn't happen).

# Generate an invalid public key
while True:
invalid_pub = random_bytes(32)
if not SECP256K1.is_x_coord(int.from_bytes(invalid_pub, 'big')):
break

# Implement a test case that detects validation logic which maps invalid public keys to the
# point at infinity in the tweaking logic.
tap = taproot_construct(invalid_pub, [("true", CScript([OP_1]))], treat_internal_as_infinity=True)
add_spender(spenders, "output/invalid_x", tap=tap, key_tweaked=tap.tweak, failure={"leaf": "true", "inputs": []}, **ERR_WITNESS_PROGRAM_MISMATCH)

# Do the same thing without invalid point, to make sure there is no mistake in the test logic.
tap = taproot_construct(pubs[0], [("true", CScript([OP_1]))])
add_spender(spenders, "output/invalid_x_mock", tap=tap, key=secs[0], leaf="true", inputs=[])

# == Tests for signature hashing ==

# Run all tests once with no annex, and once with a valid random annex.
Expand Down
9 changes: 6 additions & 3 deletions test/functional/test_framework/script.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
import unittest
from typing import List, Dict

from .key import TaggedHash, tweak_add_pubkey
from .key import TaggedHash, tweak_add_pubkey, compute_xonly_pubkey

from .messages import (
CTransaction,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ def taproot_tree_helper(scripts):
# - merklebranch: the merkle branch to use for this leaf (32*N bytes)
TaprootLeafInfo = namedtuple("TaprootLeafInfo", "script,version,merklebranch,leaf_hash")

def taproot_construct(pubkey, scripts=None):
def taproot_construct(pubkey, scripts=None, treat_internal_as_infinity=False):
"""Construct a tree of Taproot spending conditions
pubkey: a 32-byte xonly pubkey for the internal pubkey (bytes)
Expand All @@ -891,7 +891,10 @@ def taproot_construct(pubkey, scripts=None):

ret, h = taproot_tree_helper(scripts)
tweak = TaggedHash("TapTweak", pubkey + h)
tweaked, negated = tweak_add_pubkey(pubkey, tweak)
if treat_internal_as_infinity:
tweaked, negated = compute_xonly_pubkey(tweak)
else:
tweaked, negated = tweak_add_pubkey(pubkey, tweak)
leaves = dict((name, TaprootLeafInfo(script, version, merklebranch, leaf)) for name, version, script, merklebranch, leaf in ret)
return TaprootInfo(CScript([OP_1, tweaked]), pubkey, negated + 0, tweak, leaves, h, tweaked)

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 5d413c8

Please sign in to comment.