Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Polish #33566

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Polish #33566

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

izeye
Copy link
Contributor

@izeye izeye commented Sep 19, 2024

This PR polishes a bit.

@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on label Sep 19, 2024
@sbrannen sbrannen self-assigned this Sep 19, 2024
@sbrannen sbrannen added type: task A general task and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged or decided on labels Sep 19, 2024
@sbrannen sbrannen added this to the 6.2.0-RC2 milestone Sep 19, 2024
@sbrannen sbrannen closed this in 3ba9d35 Sep 20, 2024
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ class JdkClientHttpRequest extends AbstractClientHttpRequest {
private final HttpRequest.Builder builder;


public JdkClientHttpRequest(HttpMethod httpMethod, URI uri, DataBufferFactory bufferFactory,
JdkClientHttpRequest(HttpMethod httpMethod, URI uri, DataBufferFactory bufferFactory,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although I fully understand the desire to remove public here, historically the code base often makes constructors public even if the enclosing type is not public.

Look at the other JdkClientHttpRequest implementation as well as neighboring classes for examples.

In light of that, I removed this change when merging the PR.

@sbrannen
Copy link
Member

This has been merged into main in 8931b75 and partially revised in a related commit (8931b75).

Thanks

@izeye izeye deleted the polish-20240919 branch September 20, 2024 09:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: task A general task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants