Fix issue 5895

[akash8843]

Resolves #5895

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request fixes comments related to the benchmark issue and functionality for better code clarity and documentation.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:
Resolves #5895

Acknowledgment

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request?
This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
math/base/special/binet	$\color{green}250/250$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}9/9$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}250/250$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/levy/variance	$\color{green}176/176$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}9/9$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}176/176$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
stats/base/dists/normal/mgf	$\color{green}293/293$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}19/19$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}293/293$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[akash8843]

Subject: Request for Code Review — Fix for Issue #5895

Hello @stdlib-bot ,@kgryte ,

I have worked on resolving issue #5895 and have submitted a pull request for the changes. I have made the necessary fixes, updated the comments, and ensured that the code aligns with the project's guidelines.

Could you please review my pull request whenever you have time? Let me know if there are any improvements or adjustments needed.

Thank you for your guidance and support!

Best regards,
Akash Shukla

[kgryte]

@akash8843 Thank you for your interest in stdlib; however, same comments as #5954. Namely, this PR includes many undesired changes and the referenced issue was already addressed in #5953. As such, I am going to close this PR.