Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore: fix EditorConfig lint errors (issue #6270) #6303

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

chore: fix EditorConfig lint errors (issue #6270) #6303

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Kavyansh-Bagdi
Copy link
Contributor

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?
This pull request resolves the linting failures detected in the automated EditorConfig lint workflow run.

Specifically, it:

  • Corrects the indentation on lines 463, 465, 467, 469 of the file lib/node_modules/@stdlib/lapack/base/dge-trans/test/test.ndarray.js.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No questions.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No additional information.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

@stdlib-js/reviewers

@Kavyansh-Bagdi
chore: fix EditorConfig lint errors (issue #<ISSUE_NUMBER>)
4fb749c 
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added LAPACK Issue or pull request related to the Linear Algebra Package (LAPACK). First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. labels Mar 22, 2025
stdlib-bot
stdlib-bot reviewed Mar 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👋 Hi there! 👋

And thank you for opening your first pull request! We will review it shortly. 🏃 💨

@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
lapack/base/dge-trans $\color{green}348/348$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}19/19$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$ 		$\color{green}348/348$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@kgryte kgryte added autoclose: Already Resolved Pull request which should be auto-closed due proposed changes duplicating already included changes. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Mar 22, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for working on this pull request. However, we cannot accept your contribution as the issue this pull request seeks to resolve has already been addressed in a different pull request or commit.

Thank you again for your interest in stdlib, and we look forward to reviewing your future contributions.

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot closed this Mar 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot stdlib-bot left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
autoclose: Already Resolved Pull request which should be auto-closed due proposed changes duplicating already included changes. First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. LAPACK Issue or pull request related to the Linear Algebra Package (LAPACK).
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix EditorConfig lint errors
3 participants
@Kavyansh-Bagdi @stdlib-bot @kgryte