docs: replace manual for loop in examples

[hrshya]

Resolves none .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• replaces manual for loop in examples for math/base/special/floor10, math/base/special/floorf, math/base/special/floorsd, math/base/special/fmod and math/base/special/fmodf packages.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

• resolves no related issues.

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
math/base/special/floor10	$\color{green}193/193$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}19/19$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}193/193$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
math/base/special/floorf	$\color{green}157/157$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}157/157$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
math/base/special/floorsd	$\color{green}218/218$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}27/27$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}218/218$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
math/base/special/fmod	$\color{green}183/183$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}5/5$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}183/183$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
math/base/special/fmodf	$\color{green}188/188$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}5/5$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}2/2$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}188/188$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[hrshya]

How can I resolve this first_time_greeting ci issue ?

cc: @kgryte

[kgryte]

@hrshya Nothing you need to do on your end. @Planeshifter is working to fix it.

[kgryte]

Looks like there is a bug in our string/format implementation in which %% fails to render a % symbol. This deviates from expected C99 printf behavior: https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/io/fprintf. That should get fixed in the upstream package so we can unblock this PR.

[anandkaranubc]

@hrshya This PR will be ready to land once #6695 is merged.

[Planeshifter]

/stdlib rebase

[stdlib-bot]

/stdlib rebase

@Planeshifter, the slash command failed to complete. Please check the workflow logs for details.

View workflow run

[Planeshifter]

/stdlib merge

[stdlib-bot]

PR Commit Message

docs: replace manual `for` loop in examples

PR-URL: https://github.com/stdlib-js/stdlib/pull/6623

Co-authored-by: Athan Reines <kgryte@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: hrshya <harshyadav6078@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: stdlib-bot <noreply@stdlib.io>
Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <kgryte@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Athan <kgryte@gmail.com>

Please review the above commit message and make any necessary adjustments.