Skip to content

Correctly omit transactionData field when transaction simulation fails #497

Correctly omit transactionData field when transaction simulation fails

Correctly omit transactionData field when transaction simulation fails #497

Triggered via pull request August 28, 2024 20:00
Status Success
Total duration 4m 31s
Artifacts

codeql.yml

on: pull_request
Matrix: analyze
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

3 warnings
Analyze (go)
The following actions use a deprecated Node.js version and will be forced to run on node20: actions/cache@v3. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/
Analyze (go)
Unexpected input(s) 'go-version', valid inputs are ['']
Analyze (go)
Unexpected input(s) 'go-version', valid inputs are ['']