Only raise a warning, not an error for privileged ports #168
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On MacOS, on Linux if using
authbind
, and maybe other cases I don't know about, you don't actually need to use sudo to bind to ports < 1024. However when I try to bind to port 80, Node Foreman raises an error. If I prevent Node Foreman from throwing an error it works fine.Since we can't detect if this system will or will not require sudo we can just raise a warning instead. We could omit the warning entirely but it might be harder to diagnose the issue if you your system does require sudo?
The use case for me is running a local webserver on port 80 and not having to enter a sudo password every time or unnecessarily elevate permissions.
I've been working around the issue by using a different environment variable to pass the PORT through, but that's pretty confusing for everyone else on the team 😁
I'm having trouble finding a reference for the MacOS guidelines; this is the best I could find: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18302380