Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu #1241

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

aledomu
Copy link

@aledomu aledomu commented Dec 8, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 46.17%. Comparing base (ddca0b8) to head (9214687).
Report is 13 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1241      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   46.20%   46.17%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         186      186              
  Lines       66139    66138       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        30561    30537      -24     
- Misses      35578    35601      +23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@aledomu
Copy link
Author

aledomu commented Dec 8, 2024

This requires work on the CI/CD side as with the musl variant:

Unable to find image 'tectonictypesetting/crossbuild:aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu' locally
docker: Error response from daemon: manifest for tectonictypesetting/crossbuild:aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu not found: manifest unknown: manifest unknown.

@CraftSpider
Copy link
Contributor

The CI images currently come from here:
https://github.com/tectonic-typesetting/tectonic-ci-support/tree/master/cross-images

They're based on very old versions of the original cross containers, as I understand, with the additional dependencies required by Tectonic added on top.

@aledomu
Copy link
Author

aledomu commented Feb 16, 2025

Since this is far easier to do for the maintainer than myself and I don't need this anymore nor I see any interest from the maintainer, I'm closing this.

@aledomu aledomu closed this Feb 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants