Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update TableBodyCell.svelte #1503

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

cimagle
Copy link
Contributor

@cimagle cimagle commented Dec 16, 2024

Fix onclick for td element

Closes #

πŸ“‘ Description

Status

  • Not Completed
  • Completed

βœ… Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • I have checked the page with https://validator.unl.edu/
  • All the tests have passed
  • My pull request is based on the latest commit (not the npm version).

β„Ή Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of click events in the table cell component to ensure proper functionality.
  • Refactor

    • Updated the method of accessing click event handlers for enhanced performance and reliability.

Fix onclick for td element
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 16, 2024

@cimagle is attempting to deploy a commit to the Themesberg Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a modification to the TableBodyCell.svelte component, specifically changing how click event handlers are accessed. The update shifts from using $$props.onclick to $$restProps.onclick, which affects the event handling mechanism while maintaining the component's core functionality and rendering logic.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/lib/table/TableBodyCell.svelte Updated click event handler access from $$props.onclick to $$restProps.onclick

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Props and Clicks

In Svelte's domain, where components dance,
A subtle shift, a prop's sweet glance
From props to restProps, events take flight
With cleaner code, our logic shines bright!

πŸ–±οΈ Click away, my component dear! πŸŽ‰


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/lib/table/TableBodyCell.svelte (2)

19-20: Good improvement using $$restProps instead of $$props!

Using $$restProps.onclick instead of $$props.onclick is a better practice in Svelte as it properly separates explicitly declared props from forwarded ones, reducing potential naming conflicts.

Consider adding type safety for the onclick handler:

interface $$Props extends HTMLTdAttributes {
  tdClass?: string;
+ onclick?: (event: MouseEvent) => void;
}

20-23: Enhance button accessibility and styling

While using a button for click handling is good for keyboard accessibility, consider these improvements:

  1. Add appropriate ARIA attributes
  2. Ensure the button spans the full cell for better UX

Consider applying these enhancements:

- <button on:click={$$restProps.onclick}>
+ <button
+   on:click={$$restProps.onclick}
+   class="w-full h-full text-left"
+   role="button"
+   tabindex="0">
    <slot />
  </button>
πŸ“œ Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2257cbc and bf63e6e.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/lib/table/TableBodyCell.svelte (1 hunks)
πŸ”‡ Additional comments (1)
src/lib/table/TableBodyCell.svelte (1)

19-23: Verify existing TableBodyCell usage patterns

Let's ensure this change doesn't break existing implementations that might rely on the previous behavior.

βœ… Verification successful

Let me try a different search strategy to find usage patterns of TableBodyCell.


Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response. The codebase analysis shows that TableBodyCell is primarily used for displaying data in tables, and the onclick handler is only used in specific cases for interactive elements like "Edit" or "Remove" links, which are wrapped in their own cell content.

No breaking changes detected in TableBodyCell onclick implementation

The change to wrap onclick content in a button element is a safe enhancement that:

  1. Maintains backward compatibility as it only affects cells with explicit onclick handlers
  2. Improves accessibility by properly wrapping interactive content in button elements
  3. Does not impact the majority of TableBodyCell usages, which are static content displays
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for TableBodyCell usage with onclick handlers
echo "Checking TableBodyCell usage patterns..."
rg -l "TableBodyCell" | xargs rg -A 2 -B 2 "onclick"

# Look for potential test files
echo "Checking for related test files..."
fd -g "*TableBodyCell*.test.*"

Length of output: 253


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all imports and usages of TableBodyCell
echo "Checking TableBodyCell imports and usages..."
rg -A 5 "TableBodyCell"

# Search for any Svelte files containing table-related components
echo "Checking table-related Svelte files..."
fd -e svelte | rg -l "table|Table"

Length of output: 53671

@cimagle cimagle closed this Dec 16, 2024
@cimagle cimagle deleted the patch-2 branch December 16, 2024 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant