chore: Feedback sync script (example) #3160
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jessicamcinchak
approved these changes
May 17, 2024
| team_themes | ||
| # Optional tables | ||
| # Please comment in if working on a feature and you require example data locally | ||
| # You will need to manually grant select permissions to the github_actions on production, and update main.sql |
|
The operation example is actually a good one and a second use for this type of thing. I'll actually go ahead and merge - if it feels excessive or noisy in future we can move to docs or an alternate script or something in future. |
|
Removed vultr server and associated DNS entries |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not really advocating for this to be merged, but I wanted some sort of history here and it may prove to be helpful for others.
I added a
feedback.sqlso I could get a copy of production data locally.Commenting out an item in the list seemed a nicer pattern than a flag per table or some other optional inputs to the script. A bit quick and dirty but worked well for me.