Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: fix audit entries and setup Slack notifications for production S3 + Power Automate submissions #3439
chore: fix audit entries and setup Slack notifications for production S3 + Power Automate submissions #3439
Changes from 4 commits
cdb0110
6bd21dd
b879206
eda0bf3
927139f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess the
return
here was the original issue - the audit table step wasn't being properly awaited?Can't quite follow what the exact issue was but it could be caused by mixing
await
andthen()
, which can lead to some issues. It might be worth just using async/await throughout and adding back thereturn
here.Not sure if this is totally necessary but it might make things a little easier to follow and reason with.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct! Everything working as expected without this
return
now, sorry I didn't explicitly call this out.Agree the mix of async/await and an Axios
.then()
are a bit confusing to reason about, but this now exactly matches the pattern we have for auditing BOPS etc (perhaps worth revisiting in whole in a future PR for consistency!): https://github.com/theopensystemslab/planx-new/blob/main/api.planx.uk/modules/send/bops/bops.ts#L134