-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: Alter layout and copy of Feedback component in Footer #3542
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0a6a867
alter feedback title and message order and copy
RODO94 013809b
adjust comp to fit new feedback form structure
RODO94 42d5491
simplify feedbackDisclaimer file and comp
RODO94 7c7fae3
alter feedback header title
RODO94 c8b3ac8
update getbyText in index.test
RODO94 b677496
alter component structure from daf's comment
RODO94 47d62da
update from daf recent comments
RODO94 0695cc5
alter materialui import
RODO94 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Split this
<FeedbackDisclaimer>
into two imports for each disclaimer, one focused on personal / financial data as<FeedbackDataDisclaimer>
and one focused on the monitoring of the feedback<FeedbackMonitoringDisclaimer>
.Situated them in the same file as they both serve similar functions and contextually relevant, but seperate enough in structure to have as separate components.
Be good to have thoughts on this pattern...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally, if we have a shared content/structure it can make sense to make a component that handles structure/style, and passed in content via a prop (or in this case, I think children would be more appropriate).
This would mean that we wouldn't have to repeat this structure / style markdown -
We could instead use a pattern like this -
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DafyddLlyr thanks! Switched it to this. It felt interesting cause the text was contextually linked but had a different structure, with a link in the text. Just passed it now as it is. Hope this is cleaner