-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: editors can select which planning constraints to check #3968
Merged
Merged
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
51c7c57
editor table is selectable
jessicamcinchak 99bea39
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:theopensystemslab/planx-new into je…
jessicamcinchak ea49acb
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:theopensystemslab/planx-new into je…
jessicamcinchak ec1c451
only kick off frontend GIS requests for selected datasets
jessicamcinchak b575d1d
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:theopensystemslab/planx-new into je…
jessicamcinchak 4147b44
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:theopensystemslab/planx-new into je…
jessicamcinchak 65e699e
editor validation plus api gis query params
jessicamcinchak fefc6a9
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:theopensystemslab/planx-new into je…
jessicamcinchak c63941f
add editor tests
jessicamcinchak edcfd70
add exactly one planning constraints rule to publish validation checks
jessicamcinchak 5741b31
use validationSchema and update checkboxes
jessicamcinchak 48f3b6a
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:theopensystemslab/planx-new into je…
jessicamcinchak bb8b36e
working automation?
jessicamcinchak fa8e206
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:theopensystemslab/planx-new into je…
jessicamcinchak 8fdf00f
updated logic and tests
jessicamcinchak 5dc3813
adjust compute passport too
jessicamcinchak File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's tricky as these aren't 1:1 Planning.data datasets, but I think we should use a more meaningful param name here - maybe
datasets
, but this isn't ideal given the context here and the existing meaningdatasets
has.We also need to add this new param to Swagger docs 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Went with
vals
because the response includes aval
property for each item - agree not most semantically meaningful though ! Continue to strongly oppose "datasets" though as that already corresponds to Planning Data source, not our curated constraint item which rely on one or many source datasets.