-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add audit table for data migration scripts #4095
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
...planx.uk/migrations/1734623060683_create_table_public_temp_data_migrations_audit/down.sql
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
DROP TABLE "public"."temp_data_migrations_audit"; |
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions
8
...a.planx.uk/migrations/1734623060683_create_table_public_temp_data_migrations_audit/up.sql
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | ||
CREATE TABLE "public"."temp_data_migrations_audit" ( | ||
"flow_id" uuid NOT NULL, | ||
"team_id" integer NOT NULL, | ||
"updated" boolean NOT NULL DEFAULT false, | ||
"updated_at" timestamptz NOT NULL DEFAULT now(), | ||
PRIMARY KEY ("flow_id") | ||
); | ||
COMMENT ON TABLE "public"."temp_data_migrations_audit" IS E'Basic table structure that we can use to track status of data migrations. Contents of this table are ephemeral and may be truncated between migrations'; |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would relationships here be helpful for queries in the migration scripts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think so ! As I see it we'll simply return the
flow_id
from this table (it's the primary key so indexed) then pass into a GraphQL relational query which will fetch the flow and its' latest published version (so meaningful foreign key is at GraphQL & existingflows
table level rather than on this one?). But please object if I'm missing a benefit of fkeys directly here!There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oof slow brain today - answered my own question there - you're totally right, if we set a proper relationship to flows here then migration script will be able to make a single query rather than two 👍 update incoming!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✅