Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thesis - eslint config #143

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 11, 2024
Merged

Thesis - eslint config #143

merged 7 commits into from
Jan 11, 2024

Conversation

ioay
Copy link
Contributor

@ioay ioay commented Jan 9, 2024

Refs: #99

Updated "@thesis-co/eslint-config" version to "github:thesis/eslint-config#7b9bc8.
Due to the above change, it was necessary to add a few eslint rules.

If we have time for it, we can also address changes to the related components to limit the number of added rules. The rule "@typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-member-access", applies to an external library that does not fit into our default eslint configuration, hence the need to leave it.

@ioay ioay self-assigned this Jan 9, 2024
@ioay ioay marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2024 21:17
Copy link
Contributor

@kkosiorowska kkosiorowska left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it is possible please add a PR description. I think we should always leave at least a minimal description so that it is clear what was done and why.

dapp/.eslintrc Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ioay ioay requested a review from kkosiorowska January 10, 2024 09:39
@ioay ioay force-pushed the eslint-config-thesis branch from e02442e to 25884ef Compare January 10, 2024 11:34
@ioay ioay requested a review from nkuba January 10, 2024 11:41
@nkuba
Copy link
Member

nkuba commented Jan 11, 2024

I let myself change the reference of the #99 task from "closes" to "refs".
I'll merge this PR, so the new code follows new rules. We still have to revisit the disabled rules and fix the code to follow them.

@nkuba nkuba merged commit c57a289 into main Jan 11, 2024
11 checks passed
@nkuba nkuba deleted the eslint-config-thesis branch January 11, 2024 20:30
@nkuba nkuba mentioned this pull request Jan 11, 2024
2 tasks
Comment on lines +20 to +76
// FIXME:
// This is temporary solution after changes of the eslint-config version: @thesis-co/eslint-config: "github:thesis/eslint-config#7b9bc8c"
// Overrides rules should be fixed file by file.
"overrides": [
{
"files": [
"src/components/Header/ConnectWallet.tsx",
"src/components/Modals/Support/MissingAccount.tsx",
"src/components/Modals/Staking/SignMessage.tsx",
"src/hooks/useDepositBTCTransaction.ts",
"src/components/shared/Form/FormTokenBalanceInput.tsx"
],
"rules": {
"@typescript-eslint/no-misused-promises": "off"
}
},
{
"files": [
"src/hooks/useSignMessage.ts"
],
"rules": {
"@typescript-eslint/no-floating-promises": "off"
}
},
{
"files": [
"src/theme/*"
],
"rules": {
"@typescript-eslint/unbound-method": "off"
}
},
{
"files": [
"src/theme/Alert.ts"
],
"rules": {
"@typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-member-access": "off"
}
},
{
"files": [
"src/components/shared/Form/FormTokenBalanceInput.tsx"
],
"rules": {
"@typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignment": "off"
}
},
{
"files": [
"src/components/shared/TokenAmountForm/index.tsx"
],
"rules": {
"@typescript-eslint/require-await": "off"
}
}
],
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one additional note here: in the future, it's probably better to do these directly in the file via /* eslint-ignore */ or // eslint-ignore-next comments. The core reasoning is that this leaves them in your face whenever you interact with those files, vs having them tucked away in an eslintrc that will likely be looked at once every 6 months at the most.

Glad we scoped this down a good bit regardless, thanks y'all!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We want to revisit all of the ignores in a follow-up PR as soon as possible (hence the FIXME and referenced issue not closed yet #99).
I was afraid that leaving the comments inline the files may make it harder to distinguish which ignores are intentional and which we want to revisit and fix.

I agree 💯 inline disables should be preferred over the ones in eslintrc.

Thank you for chiming in sir! 🙇🏻

Copy link
Collaborator

@Shadowfiend Shadowfiend Jan 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also I definitely meant eslint-disable*.

Even with inline disables I always encourage reasoning, so dropping a FIXME on it is def compatible. For example -> https://github.com/tahowallet/extension/blob/aa5c3b6ff3cee162314d473938d62aad41555b28/background/redux-slices/activities.ts#L1-L3, https://github.com/tahowallet/extension/blob/aa5c3b6ff3cee162314d473938d62aad41555b28/ui/components/Signing/Signer/SignerFrame.tsx#L9C1-L13 or https://github.com/tahowallet/extension/blob/aa5c3b6ff3cee162314d473938d62aad41555b28/ui/components/Shared/SharedIconRouterLink.tsx#L19-L20 (though the latter is arguably a bad example since we never completed the todo 😆).

Again though, this is really about future stuff, and I hear you re: the open issue. Nothing is ever perfect!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants