Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion 12: Locking pragma version to 0.8.24 #406

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 10, 2024
Merged

Suggestion 12: Locking pragma version to 0.8.24 #406

merged 5 commits into from
May 10, 2024

Conversation

dimpar
Copy link
Member

@dimpar dimpar commented May 8, 2024

It is considered best practice to deploy contracts with the same compiler version. Locking the pragma helps ensure that contracts do not accidentally get deployed using a compiler version that the code was not tested against.

It is considered best practice to deploy contracts with
the same compiler version.
Copy link

netlify bot commented May 8, 2024

‼️ Deploy request for acre-dapp-testnet rejected.

Learn more in the Netlify docs

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit c004a28

@dimpar dimpar requested a review from nkuba May 8, 2024 13:49
@dimpar dimpar self-assigned this May 8, 2024
@dimpar dimpar added the 🔗 Solidity Solidity contracts label May 8, 2024
dimpar added 4 commits May 10, 2024 09:38
The previous version didn't support solidity compiler 0.8.24. Current
version does.
This is one to the latest version of Solidity compiler. It is best
practice to stick with a fixed version so that the code is tested
against concrete compiler.
@nkuba nkuba enabled auto-merge May 10, 2024 07:59
@nkuba nkuba changed the title Suggestion 12: Locking pragma version to 0.8.21 Suggestion 12: Locking pragma version to 0.8.24 May 10, 2024
@nkuba nkuba merged commit d9cfc07 into main May 10, 2024
21 checks passed
@nkuba nkuba deleted the locking-pragma branch May 10, 2024 08:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🔗 Solidity Solidity contracts
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants