Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Probes ipc4 get config #5249

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: topic/sof-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jsarha
Copy link

@jsarha jsarha commented Nov 20, 2024

  • Some trivial fixes
  • proper sof_probes_ipc_ops points_info() implementation for ipc4
  • more informative debufs read output for ipc4
  • all availabe probe points option to points_info() and a separate debugfs file for it

The functionality of the new features depend on thesofproject/sof#9669

@jsarha jsarha marked this pull request as ready for review November 20, 2024 20:43
@jsarha jsarha force-pushed the probes_ipc4_get_config branch 5 times, most recently from 39862fe to 32b8154 Compare November 21, 2024 15:46
lgirdwood
lgirdwood previously approved these changes Nov 21, 2024
Copy link
Member

@lgirdwood lgirdwood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, nice addition to make this way easier to use.

@jsarha
Copy link
Author

jsarha commented Nov 21, 2024

The small updates are for fixing sparse warnings from exotic builds. The check fails at first failed file and commit, so there is many iterations. Missing documentation, wrong format string for 32-bit build, etc. etc.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ujfalusi ujfalusi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jsarha, you are flexing again the boundaries of what sof-clients can do ;)
There are couple of places that we need to align with the definition of sof-client, I know it makes things a bit harder, but I want to keep the rules applicable.

sound/soc/sof/sof-client-probes-ipc4.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sound/soc/sof/sof-client-probes-ipc4.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sound/soc/sof/sof-client-probes-ipc4.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sound/soc/sof/sof-client-probes.c Show resolved Hide resolved
sound/soc/sof/sof-client-probes.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sound/soc/sof/sof-client-probes.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Author

@jsarha jsarha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ujfalusi for feedback! I'll drop the first commit, implement the find widgets wrapper, and add the new sof_probes_ipc_ops callback.

sound/soc/sof/sof-client-probes-ipc4.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sound/soc/sof/sof-client-probes.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jsarha jsarha force-pushed the probes_ipc4_get_config branch 2 times, most recently from e0c8597 to ccc2da5 Compare November 25, 2024 08:16
lgirdwood
lgirdwood previously approved these changes Nov 28, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@ujfalusi ujfalusi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jsarha, this version looks much cleaner but there are few things that should be checked.

}
info = msg.data_ptr;
*num_desc = info->num_elems;
dev_info(dev, "%s: got %zu probe points", __func__, *num_desc);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be dev_dbg() if needed at all?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll make it debug. This print will only come if someone is reading the debugfs files, e.g. and then if someting unexpected happens, its comforting to read that atleast there were some probe points received from the FW.

if (!w) {
dev_warn(dev, "matching widget to module_id %lu and instance_id %lu not found\n",
SOF_IPC4_MOD_ID_GET(desc->buffer_id),
SOF_IPC4_MOD_INSTANCE_GET(desc->buffer_id));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you use the same format for the print as it is used in sound/soc/sof/ipc4-control.c ?

		dev_err(sdev->dev, "%s: Failed to find widget for module %u.%u\n",
			__func__, ndata->module_id, ndata->instance_id);

^ as in ipc4-control.c

struct sof_probe_point_desc *desc)
{
struct device *dev = &cdev->auxdev.dev;
struct snd_sof_widget *w;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you use swidget for consistency with the rest of SOF code?

desc->buffer_id, desc->purpose, desc->stream_tag, w->widget->name,
sof_probe_type_string(SOF_IPC4_PROBE_TYPE_GET(desc->buffer_id)),
SOF_IPC4_PROBE_IDX_GET(desc->buffer_id),
desc->stream_tag ? "(probed)" : "");
Copy link
Collaborator

@ujfalusi ujfalusi Nov 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would try to find a different phrase than probed here. It caught me every time I read the log: so this module is probed (as loaded, finished probing) but others are not? Oh no, it means that this is observed, under probe, probed. probing active / under probing / * perhaps?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll go with "connected" then.

#define SOF_IPC4_PROBE_IDX_SHIFT 26
#define SOF_IPC4_PROBE_IDX_MASK GENMASK(31, 26)
#define SOF_IPC4_PROBE_IDX_GET(x) (((x) & SOF_IPC4_PROBE_IDX_MASK) \
>> SOF_IPC4_PROBE_IDX_SHIFT)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would make these defines and the sof_probe_type_string() local to ipc4-probes, they are not generic.
The SOF_IPC4_PROBE_* defines might be better in the main IPC4 header?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, for a moment I had mistaken that probe type was not ipc4 specific. Will do.

@@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ static int sof_probes_compr_shutdown(struct snd_compr_stream *cstream,
int i, ret;

/* disconnect all probe points */
ret = ipc->points_info(cdev, &desc, &num_desc);
ret = ipc->points_info(cdev, &desc, &num_desc,
PROBES_INFO_ACTIVE_PROBES);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hrm, so this will introduce an error print with IPC3 as the ACTIVE_PROBES is handled as error in there?

With IPC3 we don't have distinction between active or available probes, right? Both case should be handled in a similar way, provide all the probes.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No. The active probes is the old feature that is supported also by ipc3. The available probes, giving all connection points availbale, is the new feature that is not supperted by ipc3. E.g. this call is equivalent to the old function that did not have the type argument.

If somebody tries to read "probe_points_available" in ipc3 system, then this funcion is called with PROBES_INFO_AVAILABLE_PROBES, and there will be a read error due to an ipc error. Then again nothing, but the lack of time, is stopping us from implementing available probes query for ipc3 too.

Jyri Sarha added 6 commits November 29, 2024 14:46
Upgrade the struct sof_probes_ipc_ops points_info() method from dummy
implementation to a working implementation. The actual functionality
requires that the DSP FW supports the IPC request. The support was
just recently added. If its not there an IPC failure is reported in
the logs.

Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <[email protected]>
Add SOF_IPC4_MOD_INSTANCE_GET() and SOF_IPC4_MOD_ID_GET() for getting
the ids from ipc4 header presentation.

Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <[email protected]>
Add sof_client_ipc4_find_swidget_by_id() for finding widgets from SOF
client devices. The motivation is to decode probes debugfs output to
be more readable.

Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <[email protected]>
The current output of three integers is not very human readable. Use
ipc4 functions to describe in more detail what the struct
sof_probe_point_desc buffer_id is actually referring to in an ipc4 SOF
system.

Before this commit the "probe_points" debugfs file could read as:

Id: 0x01000004  Purpose: 0  Node id: 0x100
Id: 0x00000006  Purpose: 0  Node id: 0x100

And after in the same situation in an ipc4 system it reads:

16777220,0,256	host-copier.0.playback output buf idx 0 (probed)
6,0,256	gain.1.1 input buf idx 0 (probed)

The triplet in the beginning of the line can be used to reinserted the
probe point again by writing it into "probe_points" debugfs file, if
its first removed by writing the fist number in "probe_points_remove".
The last number is ignored when creating a probe point.

Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <[email protected]>
Add another debugfs file, "probe_points_available", that shows all the
available probe points in the SOF FW at the time of query. The probe
points are there only when an active SOF stream exists in the
system. However, the stream identifiers are persistent in the sense
that the same probe point identifiers always appear with the same
playback or capture command in the same system configuration.

The output, when reading "probe_points_available", may look like this:

16777220,0,256 host-copier.0.playback output 1 buf idx 0 (probed)
6,0,256	gain.1.1 input buf idx 0 (probed)
16777222,0,0	gain.1.1 output buf idx 0
2,0,0	mixin.1.1 input buf idx 0
16777218,0,0	mixin.1.1 output buf idx 0
3,0,0	mixout.2.1 input buf idx 0
16777219,0,0	mixout.2.1 output buf idx 0
65542,0,0	gain.2.1 input 0 buf idx 0
16842758,0,0	gain.2.1 output buf idx 0
15,0,0	smart_amp.2.1 input buf idx 0
16777231,0,0	smart_amp.2.1 output buf idx 0
65540,0,0	dai-copier.SSP.NoCodec-0.playback input buf idx 0

The triplet at the beginning of a line can be copy-pasted as such to
"probe_points" debugfs file for adding a probe point. The rest of the
line tries to give human readable explanation of what this probe point
is.

Signed-off-by: Jyri Sarha <[email protected]>
Copy link
Author

@jsarha jsarha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks again. Hope its now good. At least its converging.

desc->buffer_id, desc->purpose, desc->stream_tag, w->widget->name,
sof_probe_type_string(SOF_IPC4_PROBE_TYPE_GET(desc->buffer_id)),
SOF_IPC4_PROBE_IDX_GET(desc->buffer_id),
desc->stream_tag ? "(probed)" : "");
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll go with "connected" then.

#define SOF_IPC4_PROBE_IDX_SHIFT 26
#define SOF_IPC4_PROBE_IDX_MASK GENMASK(31, 26)
#define SOF_IPC4_PROBE_IDX_GET(x) (((x) & SOF_IPC4_PROBE_IDX_MASK) \
>> SOF_IPC4_PROBE_IDX_SHIFT)
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, for a moment I had mistaken that probe type was not ipc4 specific. Will do.

@@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ static int sof_probes_compr_shutdown(struct snd_compr_stream *cstream,
int i, ret;

/* disconnect all probe points */
ret = ipc->points_info(cdev, &desc, &num_desc);
ret = ipc->points_info(cdev, &desc, &num_desc,
PROBES_INFO_ACTIVE_PROBES);
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No. The active probes is the old feature that is supported also by ipc3. The available probes, giving all connection points availbale, is the new feature that is not supperted by ipc3. E.g. this call is equivalent to the old function that did not have the type argument.

If somebody tries to read "probe_points_available" in ipc3 system, then this funcion is called with PROBES_INFO_AVAILABLE_PROBES, and there will be a read error due to an ipc error. Then again nothing, but the lack of time, is stopping us from implementing available probes query for ipc3 too.

}
info = msg.data_ptr;
*num_desc = info->num_elems;
dev_info(dev, "%s: got %zu probe points", __func__, *num_desc);
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll make it debug. This print will only come if someone is reading the debugfs files, e.g. and then if someting unexpected happens, its comforting to read that atleast there were some probe points received from the FW.

@@ -111,6 +113,11 @@ static int ipc3_probes_info(struct sof_client_dev *cdev, unsigned int cmd,
*params = NULL;
*num_params = 0;

if (type != PROBES_INFO_ACTIVE_PROBES) {
Copy link
Author

@jsarha jsarha Nov 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ujfalusi its checked here that we only handle active probes request for ipc3, but there is no technical issue stopping us from implementing the "available" request in the FW for ipc3 and allowing it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants