Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Harmonize dependencies against NET 8 #90

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

lahma
Copy link
Contributor

@lahma lahma commented Dec 3, 2024

NET 9.x libraries are quite aggressive and can cause concern when consumed from NET 8 (LTS). Downgrading to 8.x and allowing consumers to upgrade with their own dependencies to later version.

  • drop NET 6 support which is EOL
  • make 8.0.x series default minimal
  • don't require System.Text.Json when it's built-in
  • add NET 9 SDK to ensure proper build

I would also argue whether NET 9 target is really necessary when NET 8 is already there and now NET 9 functionality is being used (via pre-processor directives etc). NET 8 binaries will run on NET 9 just fine.

* drop NET 6 support which is EOL
* make 8.0.x series default minimal
* don't require System.Text.Json when it's built-in
@lahma
Copy link
Contributor Author

lahma commented Dec 3, 2024

Appveyor seems to be a bit of a lost cause, but I fixed GH actions to run correctly by checking NET 9 SDK installation before build.

@lahma lahma marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2024 16:56
@lahma
Copy link
Contributor Author

lahma commented Dec 3, 2024

Build looking good with the changes, if looks reasonable, a nuget release would be great (with symbols from the GH action) 🙏🏻

image

image

@totpero
Copy link
Owner

totpero commented Dec 4, 2024

Hi @lahma ,
Thanks for you contribution 🙏

@totpero totpero merged commit 8d654e9 into totpero:master Dec 4, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@lahma lahma deleted the harmonize-deps branch December 4, 2024 16:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants