Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug fix, re-number match algorithms #179

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ehwenk
Copy link
Collaborator

@ehwenk ehwenk commented Feb 5, 2024

  • re-number match algorithms in online table to be identical to manuscript
  • edit function extract_genus to make genus uppercase
  • edit match algorithms to ensure genus names match equivalent columns in resources and submitted names; previously comparing canonical names from resources with genus from submitted name derivations. Changes to extract_genus function probably good enough, but this should be standardised anyway
  • replace APC-known with APC-synonyms

renumber match algorithms in online table to be identical to manuscript
* update match codes in `match_taxa`
* edit function `extract_genus` to make genus uppercase
* edit match algorithms to ensure genus names match equivalent columns in resources and submitted names; previously comparing `canonical names` from resources with `genus` from submitted name derivations. Changes to `extract_genus` function probably good enough, but this should be standardised anyway
...acknowledging this commit might get reverted, but here for now.
4 phrase names in APNI where the first word was a "family" and there were mistakenly ending up as genus names when resources loaded; caught by test failure
@ehwenk ehwenk requested a review from dfalster February 6, 2024 02:47
@ehwenk ehwenk merged commit 3fcc6a3 into master Feb 6, 2024
8 checks passed
@ehwenk ehwenk deleted the renumber-match-algorithms branch February 6, 2024 20:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants