Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upwind FDSBP cleanup, part 2 #1285

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 2, 2022
Merged

Upwind FDSBP cleanup, part 2 #1285

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 2, 2022

Conversation

ranocha
Copy link
Member

@ranocha ranocha commented Dec 2, 2022

This is based on the comments of @sloede in #1275.

CC @andrewwinters5000

@ranocha ranocha requested a review from sloede December 2, 2022 06:11
Copy link
Member

@sloede sloede left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@ranocha ranocha merged this pull request into dev Dec 2, 2022
@ranocha ranocha deleted the hr/dev_cleanup branch December 2, 2022 11:45
ranocha added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2022
* implementation of positive/negative part preferred by Michael

Co-authored-by: Michael Schlottke-Lakemper <[email protected]>

* more experimental warnings

* let Julia handle promotion of numbers

* improve docstring of FluxUpwind

* FDSBP constructor

* use D_upw as canonical name in examples

Co-authored-by: Michael Schlottke-Lakemper <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants