-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
T8codeMesh: Switching to t8_cmesh_new_brick_{2,3}d
.
#1939
T8codeMesh: Switching to t8_cmesh_new_brick_{2,3}d
.
#1939
Conversation
Review checklistThis checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging. Purpose and scope
Code quality
Documentation
Testing
Performance
Verification
Created with ❤️ by the Trixi.jl community. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1939 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 96.38% 96.37% -0.00%
==========================================
Files 480 480
Lines 37859 37855 -4
==========================================
- Hits 36487 36482 -5
- Misses 1372 1373 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
…hub.com:trixi-framework/Trixi.jl into t8code-switch-to-own-cmesh-brick-implementation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ignoring the invalidations test, everything seems alright!
t8_cmesh_new_brick_{2,3}d
.t8_cmesh_new_brick_{2,3}d
.
# test is currently broken as t8code applies a correction on the fly | ||
# @test_throws "Discovered negative volumes" begin | ||
@test begin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like this is not broken anymore, correct? Could you please fix the comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The story behind this is a bit more involved. We will elaborate the comment a bit more.
Title says it all. This PR can only be merged after a new t8code release including PR DLR-AMR/t8code#1047.