-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
calc_volume_integral!
for all meshes supported by fv_kernel!
#2014
calc_volume_integral!
for all meshes supported by fv_kernel!
#2014
Conversation
Review checklistThis checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging. Purpose and scope
Code quality
Documentation
Testing
Performance
Verification
Created with ❤️ by the Trixi.jl community. |
This vol_int should work directly for the |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2014 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.23% 96.23%
=======================================
Files 462 462
Lines 37074 37074
=======================================
Hits 35675 35675
Misses 1399 1399
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
This is also what I recall. 👍
I have added a test where I recycle the existing |
calc_volume_integral!
for all meshes supported by fv_kernel!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks
Although
fv_kernel!
is implemented for most (all) available meshes, the callingcalc_volume_integral
was not allowing this.The only untested case is the
UnstructuredMesh2D
- I couldXref: #425