-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restart HyperbolicParabolic
with SplitODEProblem
#2156
Restart HyperbolicParabolic
with SplitODEProblem
#2156
Conversation
Review checklistThis checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging. Purpose and scope
Code quality
Documentation
Testing
Performance
Verification
Created with ❤️ by the Trixi.jl community. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIRC, you said this is technically breaking? Before this would have simply give an error, right? Or would currently working code behave differently in any way?
So you would get no error, but just a simulation with the hyperbolic part only. |
Ah, the previous |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2156 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.36% 96.36%
=======================================
Files 480 480
Lines 38069 38075 +6
=======================================
+ Hits 36684 36690 +6
Misses 1385 1385
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
@JoshuaLampert Just ping me for the "semicolon removal" PR addressing #2156 (comment) |
Previously, when restarting a parabolic semidiscretization only a standard
ODEProblem
would be constructed, completely neglecting therhs_prabolic!
. This takes care of this bug.