Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use enum instead of symbols for indexing #2178

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

benegee
Copy link
Contributor

@benegee benegee commented Nov 25, 2024

Some containers in Trixi.jl contain symbols, e.g. node_indices in P4estInterfaceContainer. Symbols are not isbits, which could e.g. prevent GPU offloading.

Copy link
Contributor

Review checklist

This checklist is meant to assist creators of PRs (to let them know what reviewers will typically look for) and reviewers (to guide them in a structured review process). Items do not need to be checked explicitly for a PR to be eligible for merging.

Purpose and scope

  • The PR has a single goal that is clear from the PR title and/or description.
  • All code changes represent a single set of modifications that logically belong together.
  • No more than 500 lines of code are changed or there is no obvious way to split the PR into multiple PRs.

Code quality

  • The code can be understood easily.
  • Newly introduced names for variables etc. are self-descriptive and consistent with existing naming conventions.
  • There are no redundancies that can be removed by simple modularization/refactoring.
  • There are no leftover debug statements or commented code sections.
  • The code adheres to our conventions and style guide, and to the Julia guidelines.

Documentation

  • New functions and types are documented with a docstring or top-level comment.
  • Relevant publications are referenced in docstrings (see example for formatting).
  • Inline comments are used to document longer or unusual code sections.
  • Comments describe intent ("why?") and not just functionality ("what?").
  • If the PR introduces a significant change or new feature, it is documented in NEWS.md with its PR number.

Testing

  • The PR passes all tests.
  • New or modified lines of code are covered by tests.
  • New or modified tests run in less then 10 seconds.

Performance

  • There are no type instabilities or memory allocations in performance-critical parts.
  • If the PR intent is to improve performance, before/after time measurements are posted in the PR.

Verification

  • The correctness of the code was verified using appropriate tests.
  • If new equations/methods are added, a convergence test has been run and the results
    are posted in the PR.

Created with ❤️ by the Trixi.jl community.

github-actions[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 97.97980% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.36%. Comparing base (0046123) to head (033a817).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/solvers/dgsem_p4est/containers_3d.jl 94.12% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2178   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.36%   96.36%           
=======================================
  Files         480      480           
  Lines       38230    38230           
=======================================
  Hits        36840    36840           
  Misses       1390     1390           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 96.36% <97.98%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@benegee
Copy link
Contributor Author

benegee commented Nov 25, 2024

@sloede @ranocha @vchuravy @jmark

Introducing an enum as discussed seems to work.

@sloede
Copy link
Member

sloede commented Nov 27, 2024

Thanks for taking care of this! Once you're ready, please mark this PR as ready for review and request one from me.

@benegee benegee marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2024 05:51
@benegee benegee requested a review from sloede November 27, 2024 05:51
Copy link
Member

@ranocha ranocha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on this! Please find below some comments.

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
using OrdinaryDiffEq
using Trixi
import Trixi.Indexing
Copy link
Member

@ranocha ranocha Nov 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the coupling stuff becomes non-experimental, we should export this from Trixi.jl.

Suggested change
import Trixi.Indexing
using Trixi: Indexing # coupling is an experimental feature

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What not

Suggested change
import Trixi.Indexing
using Trixi: Indexing

Not a big fan of import and it seems like the Julia community is slowly eschewing import. But it's not a big deal either IMHO, so we can also just leave it as it is.

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
using OrdinaryDiffEq
using Trixi
import Trixi.Indexing
Copy link
Member

@ranocha ranocha Nov 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
import Trixi.Indexing
using Trixi: Indexing # coupling is an experimental feature

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
using OrdinaryDiffEq
using Trixi
import Trixi.Indexing
Copy link
Member

@ranocha ranocha Nov 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
import Trixi.Indexing
using Trixi: Indexing # coupling is an experimental feature

Comment on lines +754 to +779
end # @muladd; put it up here because module definition below needs to be at top level

# For some mesh types, elements next to a surface may have local coordinate systems
# that are not aligned so the nodes may have to be indexed differently.
# `IndexInfo` is used to describe how the nodes should be indexed.
# For example, in 2d a `Tuple` with two `IndexInfo` objects, one for each dimension,
# would be used.
# `first` or `last` indicates that the corresponding index is constant and is either
# the first or the last one. This effectively encodes the position of the surface
# with respect to the local coordinate system. The other `IndexInfo` object(s)
# encode if the index in the corresponding dimension is running forward or backward.
#
# The Enum is wrapped in a module and exported so that the enum values do not pollute
# the global namespace and can only be accessed via `Indexing.value`.
module Indexing
@enum IndexInfo begin
first
last
i_forward
i_backward
j_forward
j_backward
end
export IndexInfo
end
using .Indexing
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is basically https://github.com/fredrikekre/EnumX.jl, so I think we should use that package instead. We should also discuss where to move this definition - https://github.com/trixi-framework/Trixi.jl/blob/main/src/basic_types.jl or auxiliary could also make sense.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tend to agree to use specialized packages wherever sensible. However, does it really improve anything except reducing our code by ~10 lines, at the cost of (ideally) having a comment explain what the @enumx does?

But I'm fine either way 🤷‍♂️

Comment on lines 132 to +134
u::Array{uEltype, NDIMSP2} # [primary/secondary, variable, i, j, interface]
neighbor_ids::Matrix{Int} # [primary/secondary, interface]
node_indices::Matrix{NTuple{NDIMS, Symbol}} # [primary/secondary, interface]
node_indices::Matrix{NTuple{NDIMS, IndexInfo}} # [primary/secondary, interface]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sloede will tell you that you should consider using a consistent alignment of the comments here and in the other files below

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would be great indeed 😍

@vchuravy
Copy link
Member

After speaking with @maleadt in Lausanne and we decided that we might be able to permit Symbols being passed to the GPU JuliaGPU/GPUCompiler.jl#650

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants