Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add docs for no slip conditions #339
Add docs for no slip conditions #339
Changes from 1 commit
44aadd4
78bb627
a13a0fa
57414b9
c4bf379
b0c662f
faa6414
22ed9d1
ddb576c
a665595
bc02e89
45c6e05
9bd3d7f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There should be some note here how to choose
nu
and like inArtificialViscosityMonaghan
thatepsilon
is not a parameter that normally needs to be changed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nu
ist just the physical kinematic viscosity.I can add:
epsilon=0.01
: Parameter to prevent singularities and is usually chosen as0.01
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok so I might have done it wrong than. Because I have used two viscosities and setting the viscosity of the boundary one to a nu that results in a wall velocity near 0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note, that the velocity of the boundary (the dummy particle velocity) is not zero but the geometric wall velocity is zero when using the viscous interaction with the fluid.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sry what I meant was the fluid velocity next to the wall.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here is a simulation I did few weeks ago. There is a very high gradient.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes it worked for me as well I just used a larger viscosity for the boundary viscosity than in the bulk.