Fixed Tangling #2
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
code block names markup for noweb references was broken with newer emacs/orgmode versions
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Code block names markup for noweb references was broken with newer emacs/orgmode versions. Actually I did not try this in older versions. With this fix, it works in Vincent Goulet's Emacs 23.4 for Windows Modified 6. This contains Emacs 23.4 and org-mode 7.8.11.
+source: would not work to name a code block which can be referenced with noweb
+name: works though (it was hard to find documentation for that).
Note that I'm a not very experienced with emacs and orgmode, and maybe I just have overlooked something else.
And please update http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/examples/article-class.html
It still contains the problem described here http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2010-12/msg00895.html