Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

changing volume template #22

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

clayrosenthal
Copy link

@clayrosenthal clayrosenthal commented Jun 6, 2024

User description

Changing the volumeRequestTemplate to pass the whole .spec in, rather than specific fields.

Fixes #21


PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Updated the volume template in statefulset.yaml to pass the entire .spec object instead of specific fields.
  • Removed explicit references to accessModes and resources.requests.storage.
  • Improved template readability and maintainability by using the toYaml function.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
statefulset.yaml
Update volume template to pass entire `.spec` object         

charts/vespa/templates/statefulset.yaml

  • Changed volume template to pass the entire .spec object.
  • Removed specific field references for accessModes and
    resources.requests.storage.
  • Utilized toYaml function for better readability and maintainability.
  • +2/-5     

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Jun 6, 2024

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the changes are limited to a single file and involve simplifying the template by using a more dynamic YAML rendering approach. The logic is straightforward and the amount of changed code is small.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    ⚡ Possible issues

    Possible Bug: The change assumes that all necessary fields are present in .spec without null values. If .spec is incomplete or improperly formatted, this could lead to runtime errors or misconfigurations in the stateful set.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    Copy link

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Jun 6, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Adjust the indentation level for the toYaml function to ensure consistent formatting

    Ensure that the toYaml function properly handles indentation and formatting by using
    nindent with a consistent value. This helps avoid potential formatting issues.

    charts/vespa/templates/statefulset.yaml [63]

    -{{- toYaml .spec | nindent 6 }}
    +{{- toYaml .spec | nindent 8 }}
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: The suggestion to adjust the indentation from 6 to 8 in the toYaml function is valid for consistency and readability. However, without more context on the surrounding code's indentation levels, it's hard to definitively say if 8 is the correct indentation level over 6. Thus, the suggestion is potentially beneficial but not critical.

    5

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    Can't specify storageClassName
    1 participant