-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added a function that can filter error trees which are in optional positions in a grammar (list elements and optionals) #2074
Open
jurgenvinju
wants to merge
6
commits into
feat/error-recovery
Choose a base branch
from
feat/error-recovery-remove-optional-errors
base: feat/error-recovery
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2725c65
added a function that can filter error trees which are in optional po…
jurgenvinju 6606117
added more experimental features to error recovery
jurgenvinju 7a4d959
fixes and doc additions
jurgenvinju c447811
improved docs
jurgenvinju c32f3bd
improved readability of private addStats function
jurgenvinju 27b64f2
added comments
jurgenvinju File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know if this is helpful, but
disambiguateErrors
(implemented in Java) does something similar while disambiguating.Maybe we can merge the two.
Note that the method you implemented here will bring down the system when a highly ambiguous error tree (not uncommon) is supplied, because sharing will be lost.
I think adding
@memo
might solve this, but we might want to consider implementing this in Java by reusing some of thedisambiguateErrors
implementation.Because of your implementation here I just realized
disambiguateErrors
currently has a bug because it considers error trees with an emptyskipped
part as a non-error trees. This has become a bug only after #2053 was merged. I will fix this issue.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi. I added it here as an experiment/demo to see how we can write this kind of code in Rascal. I suspect most of this will be called from Rascal in the future. Good catch with the @memo! We don't have a
visit
strategy that incorporatesmemo
, so that is really something to watch out for here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think if we merge this we should probably stick with the Java version for now, given that it is much fast in dangerous cases with lots of nested ambiguity.