Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix coverage files generation #7401

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

RenjiSann
Copy link
Collaborator

@RenjiSann RenjiSann commented Mar 5, 2025

Fixes #7282 issue about LLVM instrumentation.

The remain BIG issue is that the quantity of trace files generated by the WHOLE testsuite is absolutely massive, because 1 call to the tested binary produces 1 trace file that is around 5 MiB.
On my machine, the testsuite had to stop at ~80% completion because it had filled my disk with 92GiB of .profraw files.

@RenjiSann RenjiSann force-pushed the coverage branch 2 times, most recently from 09a916d to 9020634 Compare March 5, 2025 01:17
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/misc/stdbuf (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

@sylvestre
Copy link
Contributor

having at least linux passing would be an improvement! :)

@RenjiSann RenjiSann force-pushed the coverage branch 2 times, most recently from ab91264 to 4f801c9 Compare March 5, 2025 11:27
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/misc/usage_vs_getopt (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

@RenjiSann RenjiSann force-pushed the coverage branch 3 times, most recently from 66fd2fa to 5812e9c Compare March 5, 2025 14:22
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

@RenjiSann RenjiSann force-pushed the coverage branch 8 times, most recently from cc00e9b to 51e845c Compare March 5, 2025 16:10
@RenjiSann
Copy link
Collaborator Author

FINALLY it seems to work. However, there is still a problem with result upload on codecov

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 5, 2025

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

@RenjiSann RenjiSann marked this pull request as draft March 6, 2025 11:51
@RenjiSann RenjiSann force-pushed the coverage branch 2 times, most recently from 4178c97 to 1545a9b Compare March 10, 2025 22:57
Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/misc/stdbuf (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)

Copy link

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/timeout/timeout (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Congrats! The gnu test tests/misc/stdbuf is no longer failing!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants