Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separated unwatch to have different docs for standalone #1597

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2024

Conversation

GumpacG
Copy link
Collaborator

@GumpacG GumpacG commented Jun 18, 2024

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:
Comments in #1539 weren't fully addressed. This PR makes unwatch consistent with other keyless commands where the apis are duplicated for cluster and standalone clients for documentation purposes.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

* Separated unwatch to have different docs for standalone

* Added line break
@GumpacG GumpacG requested a review from a team as a code owner June 18, 2024 03:09
@Yury-Fridlyand Yury-Fridlyand added the java issues and fixes related to the java client label Jun 18, 2024
@acarbonetto acarbonetto merged commit 85fc2d4 into valkey-io:main Jun 18, 2024
12 checks passed
@acarbonetto acarbonetto deleted the java/integ_guiang_fix_watch branch June 18, 2024 22:37
cyip10 pushed a commit to Bit-Quill/valkey-glide that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2024
Separated unwatch to have different docs for standalone (#372)

* Separated unwatch to have different docs for standalone

* Added line break
cyip10 pushed a commit to Bit-Quill/valkey-glide that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2024
Separated unwatch to have different docs for standalone (#372)

* Separated unwatch to have different docs for standalone

* Added line break
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
java issues and fixes related to the java client
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants