Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Java: async
getPubSubMessage
. #1770Java: async
getPubSubMessage
. #1770Changes from 11 commits
a6f2b29
148eaf8
512eaa7
1586794
9b0cef3
e76d655
e0ca0a4
025de96
eb84c2a
b11e444
8ee4741
87e5739
72da45a
5729ca6
a483c1f
42d7907
a20febd
899adce
5fa4368
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be package-private.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Compilation fails -
BaseClient
fromglide.api
uses it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That seems strange that it uses it directly. I would've thought it goes through MessageHandler.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK I see, you are creating a MessageHandler before the builder, then passing the handler in when creating the channel but passing the queue in to the client's constructor.
This is exposing a class from a non-public package to a non-private field in a public/protected class in an exposed package.
I am actually seeing that on a bunch of BaseClient classes. Let's discuss offline.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Separate from the above issue of internal classes in public APIs, I think BaseClient should not have a MessageQueue. It should always route through a MessageHandler that accesses a MessageQueue. I would MessageQueue a static inner class of MessageHandler (package-private for unit testing).
This would make it clear a MessageQueue can't really be on its own and is always tied to a MessageHandler.