-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
1806 new net p1 adding a reusable mock http client for unit tests #1868
Open
GrandinLuc
wants to merge
3
commits into
feature-thorest
Choose a base branch
from
1806-new-net-p1---adding-a-reusable-mock-http-client-for-unit-tests
base: feature-thorest
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | ||
import { type HttpClient } from '../../src'; | ||
|
||
const mockHttpClient = <T>( | ||
response: T, | ||
httpMethod: 'get' | 'post' | ||
): HttpClient => { | ||
return { | ||
[httpMethod]: jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => { | ||
return { | ||
json: jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => { | ||
return response satisfies T; | ||
}) | ||
}; | ||
}) | ||
} as unknown as HttpClient; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
export { mockHttpClient }; |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
im bit lost why we need Jest involved here
dont we just implement HttpClient interface where the rest can pas in the beforeRequest and afterResponse functions themselves, and the mock doesnt actually do a http request?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
think of more of a Stub i guess
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Copied from my comment on Slack:
After thinking a bit about it, I'm not sure I see the problem with using HttpClient for mocking things. We could be mock
fetch
and use FetchHttpClient with callbacks but that wouldn't change much about how it is testing things right now.For the jest mock implementation fns those were needed for mocking FetchHttpClient but aren't needed now that it's using HttpClient, I have just removed them in the latest commit